This study was performed to decide weight of an objective evaluation factors so optimized for small reservoirs and reservoirs that operators may survey their status and identify relevant risk factors in a timely way. In this study, evaluation factors were determined based on the expert panel results followed by the brain storming process. The selected evaluation factors were implemented on the formulation of hierarchy and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique were used to determine weight factors based on the expert survey results. It is expected that the use of the proposed weight will contribute to the more systematic and efficient safety management of small reservoirs to prevent their failures.

In this study, the deterioration of railway track was determined each element facilities which have consisted in Track, track, roadbed, bridge and tunnel and were evaluated deterioration of railway track it using AHP and DEA methods. In compared to track defect factor that currently used method in conventional track line, was similar with AHP and DEA methods. It is determined that AHP and DEA method for track deterioration can be evaluated quantitatively the condition assessment of the track line.

The purposes of this study are to identify assessment items to evaluate riverfront for amenity and recreation and to analyze the relative importance of the items using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Total 15 items of 5 categories were identified through literature review and panel discussion. Based on the AHP analysis results, a weighted value was set for each of the layers in the hierachy. ‘Ecological Characteristics’ (0.333) was rated with the highest weighted value. followed by ‘Landscape Characteristics’(0.190) and ‘Physical Characteristics’(0.166). Among the assessment items, ‘Water Quality’ (0.152) and ‘River Naturality’(0.118) had higher weighted values. With the set of assessment items field assessments were carried out for Gyung-An Stream of Gyeonggi-Do to exam its applicability. Total 6 segments and 31 reaches out of the 22.5 km long river were evaluated and the mean scores of the five categories were converted into a percentile score for comparison. Overall, the segments which had higher scores were located close to neighborhood areas and had better connections with other historical and cultural amenities. Also, existing facilities was an important factor and needs to be considered for waterfront development.

In this study, AHP analysis was conducted through a survey that was organized by 9 job categories. The results show that sustainable operation risks have the highest priority level among all criteria with management interest having the highest priority level within sustainable operation risks related attributes. The most important risk attributes among stakeholder risks appeared to be asset security and cargo and conveyance security, with education and training being the most important among regulatory risks. Effective management and response to the risks from export controls on strategic trade require an understanding of supply chain security and compliance programs, effective training programs, investments for development of security systems that meet international standards. In addition, the government needs to focus on developing professionals and providing support for companies with compliance programs, working closely with businesses.

This study developed three indices for evaluating regional brand value, i.e. awareness index, experience index, and attractiveness index. We used an AHP approach to estimate these indices for 151 rural regions (151 administrative jurisdictions in Korea). Our estimation results show that regional brand index varies considerably across regions by the individual characteristics of interviewee. First, the value of regional brand of local jurisdiction is higher than that of more integrated administrative jurisdiction. Second, the brand value of Gangwon and Jeolla region is higher than that of other regions. Third, the interviewees with school children in the age of 40-50 are likely to have higher regional brand value. The estimation results also show a need for different strategies to develop and improve regional brand.

본 연구는 퍼지 TOPSIS법과 AHP법을 이용하여 IMO 정보관리시스템의 예비과제 우선순위를 평가하기 위한 것이다. 이러한 평가를 위해 먼저 24개의 예비과제를 추출하여 FSM법을 이용하여 대체안을 구조화하였고, 최종 4개의 주요 예비과제를 도출한다. 또한 평가항목간의 가중치는 의사결정자의 일관성을 유지하면서 평가가 가능한 AHP법을 이용한다. 그러나 AHP법은 비교대상의 수가 증가하면 쌍대비교의 횟수가 증가하고, 평가에는 수많은 애매성이 존재하기 때문에 최종 우선순위 선정에는 TOPSIS에 퍼지이론을 도입한 퍼지 TOPSIS법을 이용한다. 그 결과 IMO 기준정보관리, IMO 정보기준전달, IMO 통합데이터베이스, IMO 지식허브 순으로 구축되어야 하는 것으로 나타났다.

In this study, the risk factors which derive from the ground condition of typical construction sites are put forward. In order to prioritize the risk elements, the analytical method of AHP was used. The result of using a weighting factor for each risk analysis showed that if the constituency index is less than 0.1, then reliable results and priorities for each of the risk elements can be calculated using the AHP method. From now on, if the range of measured value can be established, the risk or safety value of concrete structures for power lines can be applicable.

Purpose - Labor productivity is extremely important to the profitability and competitive advantage of organizations that provide services to customers, such as banks. This study investigates the factors driving labor productivity in Iran’s Melli Bank. Research design, data, methodology - Five managerial, psychosocial, cultural, and individual factors are identified and their relative importance for labor productivity prioritized using AHP. The required data are then collected through a questionnaire designed for a pairwise comparison of the driving factors of labor productivity and their subcategories. Results - The study outcomes reveal that the managerial and individual factors are the most important. Specifically, the most important factors in increasing labor productivity in the branches of Melli Bank are having a competent supervisor, promotion opportunities, fair working conditions, conscientiousness, the right tools, and a correspondence between skills and work. Conclusions - Implementing AHP using Expert Choice software revealed that, among the driving factors of labor productivity (i.e., managerial, psychosocial, cultural, environmental, and personal), managerial factors were considered the most important by the respondents.

산림인접지는 산불의 발화지이면서 주요 피해가 발생하는 지역이다. 이러한 지역에서의 피해와 파급효과의 사전파악과 이를 통한 관리 계획의 수립은 산불 피해를 위해 반드시 필요한 단계이다, 따라서 본 연구에서는 이러한 산림인접지 산불위험시설 및 지역의 중요도를 결정하기 위한 체계를 수립하기 위해 분석적 계층과정인 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process:분석적 계층과정) 기법을 활용하여 산림 인접지 내의 중요도 결정체계를 수립하였다. 연구결과, 인명(0.36)＞국가시설·군사시설·문화재(0.2)＞개인가옥 및 재산(0.15)＝산림보호구역(0.15)＞기타 산림보호지역(0.14) 순로 나타났다. 또한, 국가시설·군사시설·문화재 간의 중요도 결정체계에 대한 연구 결과, 국가산업시설 0.39＞문화재 0.38＞군사시설 0.24 순으로 분석되었다.

This study aimed to systematically adjust rural area development projects that have been carried out by a variety of government departments for activation of rural areas and overcome inefficient problems caused by the policies and projects promoted separately. As its alternative, this study aimed to explore efficient improvement scheme of rural villages associated with various projects. Major agriculture/rural policies and projects that have been promoted were classified by the target space of the policies and projects as Environment space, living space, and production space. Each space was categorized into five sub-items without duplication. By assessment results of rural area improvement level and preference by Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method, maintenance of rural areas was classified into four types. And outer space structure was analyzed by using Space Syntax Method(SSM). Based on the analysis result above, facilities for improvement of rural villages were placed around representative facilities. Facility allocation was based on selection and concentration in terms of facility maintenance and on type attributes in terms of spatial aspects. And finally, alternatives schemes for setting up the basic direction of improvement of rural villages are local area characteristics and environmentally conscious business plan.

오늘날 해운산업분야에서 선박관리업의 역할과 중요성은 날로 확대되고 있다. 과거 해운경기의 불황을 거치면서 다수의 해운선사들은 비용의 상승 및 선원의 공급 불안정 등의 이유로 선원관리 분야의 아웃소싱을 시도하게 되었다. 이에 따라 해운산업에서도 분업화와 전문화가 활발해지면서 국내외 선박관리기업의 경쟁이 심화되고 있다. 경쟁시대에 생존을 위해서는 국내외 해운산업의 환경변화 및 선박관리업의 현황에 대한 정확한 이해와 경쟁력 제고를 위한 요인의 파악이 시급하다. 본 연구에서는 의사결정문제를 다루는 방법으로 다양한 대안 중에서 최적의 선택대안을 도출할 때 사용하는 계층분석적 의사결정방법(AHP)를 사용하여 우리나라 선박관리기업의 경쟁력 요인 우선순위를 도출하고자 한다. 분석 결과 선박관리업의 기업경쟁력 평가 요인에서 가장 중요하게 고려해야 할 사항은 인적자원 요인으로, 이것은 우수한 선원의 학보와 우수한 해기품질을 가진 육상의 관리요원을 확보하는 것이 중요하다는 것을 알 수 있다. 본 연구는 기업경쟁력에 관한 이론을 정립하는데 기여하며, 특히 선박관리기업의 경쟁력 요인을 도출함으로써 선박관리기업의 경쟁력 제고를 위한 경영전략 수립에 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

In recent years, shipping and ports industries are faced with enormous changes like globalization, market liberalization and borderless businesses. To cope with this competitive environment, a certain form of cooperation among ports is necessary to provide high quality of services and lower costs to establish their market power against shipping companies. The purpose of this study is to identify the motivation of the strategic alliances between ports and demonstrate the level of importance using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Among four motivations of the strategic alliances which are strategic motivation, economic motivation, operational motivation and marketing motivation, economic motivation is the most important factor for ports alliances than other factors. This is because economic motivation among strategic alliances allow ports in the same market to rationalize supply and demand, thus avoiding unnecessary over-supply and over-competition and also can reduce service costs by using comparative advantages of each partner which make costs cheaper.

현재 각 관리 주체별로 절토사면에 대한 유지관리를 시행하고 있으나 평가항목 및 평가모형이 다양하고 접근방법이 상호보완적이지 못하므로 보편성 및 객관성이 부족한 실정이다. 따라서, 본 연구는 기존 절토사면 평가기법에 대한 분석을 통하여 합리적인 모형개발을 위한 접근을 시도하고 붕괴사례 분석을 통하여 붕괴 주요원인 및 인자를 발굴하고 이를 계층분석기법(AHP)을 이용하여 기존 절토사면의 조사․평가단계에서 조사우선순위를 결정하기 위한 평가표를 작성하였다.

This study aims to analyze the sensitivity of WSM(weighted scenario method)-AHP method according to variation of nonlinear exponent for accessibility criteria, which are used to make urbanization potential maps with the optimal weighting value for multiple criteria in grid-based GIS technique. Besides this study tried to develop WSM-AHP2 which is simplified by using rank of the potential value for each scenario. The two methods were applied to the test area, Suwon city located south area of Seoul, with time series land-use maps of 1986 and 1996. The evaluation system of urbanization potential have 7 criteria including 6 accessibility criteria. The results of WSM-AHP2, the optimal weighting values and their corresponding potential maps, have almost similar with those of WSM-AHP. In the application of CA(cellular automata) model for expansion of urbanized area using the three potential maps by WSM-AHP, WSM-AHP2, and specialists's AHP evaluation, it also showed that the accuracy of simulation for actual urban area is the highest in the potential map of WSM-AHP, followed by WSM-AHP2 and specialists's AHP evaluation. From the results of this study, WSM-AHP and simplified WSM-AHP2 will be used to generate the optimal potential maps for land-use planning in urban fringe area.

항만의 생산성 및 효율성에 대한 관심이 증대되고 정부주도의 항만관리와 운영체제에 대한 비효율성을 개선하기 위하여 항만공사제도의 도입이 국내 외적으로 보편화되었다. 국내에서도 2003년 항만공사법이 제정되어 2005년 7월에 인천항만공사가 출범하였다. 본 연구는 인천항만공사의 설립 목적을 극대화하기 위하여 SWOT/AHP 분석기법을 이용하여 인천항만공사의 강점, 약점, 기회, 위협요인을 파악하고 우선순위별로 인천항만공사의 발전 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 분석의 결과 인천항만공사는 사업영역확대 및 성장가능성, 인천항의 지리적 우수성 등의 강점을 확보하고 있으며, 황해권 물동량의 지속적 증가, 자유무역지대의 확대지정 등의 기회요인을 가지고 있다. 반면 정부의 투-포트시스템 정책, 중국 의존성의 가속화 심화, 국내 외 경쟁항만의 급부상 등 위협요인과 인천항만시설의 노후화 가속, 부족한 항만배후부지 등의 약점요인을 가지고 있다. 이러한 SWOT분석 결과를 근거로 계층분석적 의사결정(AHP) 방법을 이용하여 인천항만공사의 발전 방안인 S/O 전략, W/O 전략, S/T 전략, W/T 전략을 제시하였다.

과거 대부분 하천에 적용된 계획하폭의 결정은 통수단면적 확보 등의 치수적인 목적만 갖고 경험공식과 기술자의 주관이나 경험적 판단으로 계획하폭을 선정하여 왔다. 그러나 현재에는 사회적, 경제적, 기술적, 환경적 요소를 종합적으로 고려된 최적의 계획하폭 선정이 요구되고 있으며, 또한 계획하폭의 계산결과에 따른 하폭거리의 다양성으로 확폭 결정시 객관적이며 정량적인 해석방법이 필요하게 되었다. 본 연구에서는 계획하폭 선정시 문제가 되는 주관적, 경험적 요소를

최근 온라인게임 산업은 급격한 성장 속에서 개발 환경의 변화가 다양하게 나타나고 있다. 이러한 시장의 성장과 개발환경의 변화에 온라인게임 관련 기업들은 성공할 수 있는 게임을 찾기 위해 많은 노력을 하고 있으며 개발 초기단계부터 성공여부의 판단근거를 마련하기 위해 다양한 연구를 수행하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 온라인게임을 개발하고 유통하는 일련의 과정에서 온라인게임의 성공요인을 찾아보고, 전문가 조사를 통해 주요성공요인을 찾아보고 온라인게임 종사자들에게 실증조사를 실시하여 성공요인을 도출하고 도출된 요인들의 상대적 중요도를 파악하기 위해 계층적 분석방법인 AHP를 실시하여 정성적인 부분을 정량적 접근이 가능하도록 이론적 근거를 마련하고자 한다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 온라인게임 성공요인을 도출하고 계층적 분석기법인 AHP기법을 활용하여 온라인게임 성공요인의 상대적 중요도를 제시하고자 한다. 정성적인 주관적 요소를 가능한 객관화하여 각 요인에서 나타나는 적용상의 한계를 해결하여 성공적인 게임을 만들려고 하는 기업에 객관적이고 공정하게 적용해볼 수 있는 방안을 제안하고자 한다.

Recently many administrative institutes try to improve the viability of rural villages. For increasing the viability, not only infrastructures but internal vitality is necessary in rural villages. Nonetheless, most of governmental projects have been focused on infrastructures. For this reason, RDA(Rural Development Administration) designed and performed the RHL(Rural Healthy and Longevity village) project. This RHL project is not easy to evaluate the outcome because it consists of very intangible project items. In this paper, we developed a scoring model to evaluate the result of the RHL project. The scoring model based on DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) was suggested to evaluate the quantity of personal activities in each village. Personal activities are classified into five categories: regional life, social life, productive life, outdoor life and indoor life. Evaluating indices of each category are developed and weighting values are evaluated by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). The developed model was applied to Kumsan village and examined its applicability.