본 연구는 도시숲을 경관생태학적으로 해석하고 평가하기 위한 모형 개발과 적용을 통해 평가의 실효성을 검증하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 평가지표는 층위구조, 입지상태, 활엽수구성비율, 식생구성종수 등 17개이다. 평가지표 간 상관관계분석 결과, 높은 관계성을 가진 것은 임령(X8)과 공간형성기간(X10)으로 상관계수가 0.684로 나타났으며, 부(-)의 상관성을 가진 지표들은 층위구조(X1)와 위험성(X13)으로 상관계수가 -0.412로 분석되었다. 평가모형구축을 위한 다중회귀분석 결과, 10개의 모형이 도출되었으며, 총 17개 변수 중 층위구조(X1), 식생구성종수(X4) 등을 제외한 입지상태(X2), 활엽수구성비율(X3) 등 10개의 변수만이 유의확률 95%에서 통계적으로 유의하였다. 모형의 회귀식과 합산평가 매트릭스법과 비교분석 결과, 모형 3의 회귀식이 정확도 91.7%로써 전체 10개 모형 중 가장 정확한 결과를 나타내는 것으로 분석되었다. 향후 지속적인 모니터링을 통해 평가모형에 대한 정확도 증진기법에 대한 연구도 함께 수행되어야 할 것이다.

본 연구는 터널이 갖는 다양한 특성 가운데 운전자의 심리적 안정성과 쾌적성 등 경관을 구성하는 설계요인과 운전자의 감성적 요인간의 관계를 파악하여, 터널경관에 대한 평가방법을 제시하고, 이를 위하여 터널경관을 구성하는 물리적인 구성요소와 운전자의 감성인지 변화와의 관계를 파악하여 경관적 환경을 조성할 수 있는 방안을 제시하는데 연구의 목적이 있다. 터널경관에 대한 감성인지특성을 파악하기 위한 LISREL 모형을 구축한 결과 터널경관 영향요인은 터널경관 구성요소 조화에 의한 감성 이미지인 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 감성이미지는 설계요인과 개인속성에 의하여 설명며, 설계요인의 영향이 개인속성의 영향보다 크게 나타났다. 개인 속성과 설계요인 모두의 관계는 (+)의 관계로 나타났고 "안정성"과 "변화성"간에는 서로 밀접한 상관관계가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이때, "안전성" 요인이 "변화성" 요인보다 경관인지도에 좀 더 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되어, 경관 평가 시 운전자는 기본적으로 "안전성"을 중시하나 "변화성"에 대하여도 요구하고 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

종래 농촌개발전략은 농업 및 농민에게 중점을 두고 도시의 편리성을 지향하는 정책이었다. 그러나 농업에 의한 농촌발전의 한계성이 드러나고 도시를 지향하는 농촌의 정주정책은 농촌경관의 획일화를 초래함에 따라 농촌다움이 상실되는 문제점을야기하여 왔다. 이로인해, 농촌다움의 상실은 농촌 자체 매력의 상실을 가져왔으며, 이는 소비자인 도시민으로부터 외면당하는결과를 초래하였다. 이에 따라 농업과 농촌이 가지고 있는 잠재적인 기능과 다면적인 기능에 대한 재평가가 이루어지고있으며 이의 활용을 통한 농촌의 활성화를 모색하는 대안이 제기되고 있다.따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 농촌경관 자원으로서 그 중요성이 커지고 있으며, 활용가능한 자원으로 인식되고 있는 농업생산경관의심리적 특성을 분석함으로써 농촌계획에 있어 활용가능한 심리적 인자를 제시하고자 하며, 이후의 농촌계획 및 경관영향평가에 실질적으로 적용할 수 있는 평가기준을 마련하고자 한다.

제주도의 대표적 경관인 오름에 대한 경관 선호성을 분석하기 위해 총 18개 오름을 대상으로 경관평가를 시도하였다. 지상과 공중에서 촬영한 총 84장의 사진 슬라이드를 평가매체로 비 제주인(1그룹), 제주인(2그룹) 그리고 외국인(3그룹)에대한 선호도를 비교 분석한 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다.전체 총 84장의 오름경관에 대한 선호도평가 결과, Group 1은 4.93, Group 2는 5.22 로 전체 국내인 평균 평가치는5.11이었으며 Group 3의 평가치는 5.54로 나타나 제주 오름에 대한 외국인의 상대적으로 높은 선호 경향이 발견되었다.전체적으로 평가치가 가장 높은 오름경관은 Scene 8(7.60)의 비양도 부감경관이었으며 다음으로 평가치 7.59를 보인 Scene58과 평가치 7.35를 보인 Scene 48등이 보임에 따라 성산일출봉, 비양도, 송악산 등은 제주도의 대표적인 경승으로서 손색이없음이 실증적 재차 확인되었다. 한편 3개 평가 집단 간 선호도 평가치의 유의성을 확인하기 위한 ANOVA와 Duncun-test결과, 집단 간 평가치의 통계적 유의성이 인정된 평가오름은 총 63개에 이르러 오름별 평가치에 대해 그룹간의 차이가 인정된다.또한 평가그룹 간의 통계적 유의성이 인정되지 않는 21개의 오름 중에는 항공에서 조감된 부감경관은 단 하나도 포함되지않고 있음을 발견할 수 있었으며 21개 오름경관 가운데 전체 평균치인 5.34를 상회하는 오름경관은 Scene16, Scene78 그리고Scene29의 단 3개에 불과하였음을 볼 때, 부감경관에 대한 차별화된 긍정적 선호성이 입증되었다.더불어 총 18개 오름에 대한 평가치 중 민오름과 산굼부리를 제외한 총 16개 평가치가 높은 특성을 보여 하늘에서 부감한오름경관에 대한 뚜렷한 선호경향을 보였으며 이 경향은 특히 Group 3 즉 외국인 그룹에 있어 부각되었는데 지상에서 촬영한산굼부리의 지상경관 또한 굼부리 중심의 부감경관임을 감안하면 이러한 경향을 더욱 뚜렷하다고 볼 수 있다.

This research is significant in terms of estimating the validity by setting evaluation items in view of integrating not only original beauty and visual areas but also natural ecological areas based on questionnaire. The results are as follows. 1) According to literature study, 17 items such as variety, the character of sites in terms of landscape, the beauty of landscape, visibility, and ratio of green visibility are selected. Also, 21 items such as variety of animals and plants species, size of green area, and ecological naturalness are selected in the area of landscape ecological resources. 2) As a result of questionnaire of the group of landscape experts, animals and plants ecological areas show 5.6341, the highest in importance analysis according to assessment areas. Also, as a result of importance analysis on items in each area, for example, in the area of visual resources, the item of skyline analysis is 6.0488, the highest. 3) As a result of corelation of item meaning on landscape effect assesment, for example, meaningness of psychological assessment item and landscape site item indicate 0.710, the highest coefficient correlation. 4) As critical assessment items per unit project, items such as damage minimization of original land features for project in terms of point, ratio of green visibility, variety of animals and plants species marked above 8.0 as high important medium. The project in terms of line, minimization of original land features, preservation of worthy biotope showed high point and the character of sites in terms of landscape, minimization of original land features, the size of green area, and analysis of skyline marked above 8.5 as high importance points. On the contrary, items for climate and soil showed relatively low points.

제주시와 부산시 해안변의 경관훼손부분에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 해안경관은 초점경관과 경관흡수인자들에 의하여 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 부산시과 제주시의 해안경관을 조사한 결과 횟집수조 내 공급되는 해수를 인근 해역에 해수 파이프를 설치하여 이용하고 있으나 무질서하게 설치된 해수 인수관으로 인하여 아름다운 해안경관의 미관을 해치고 있으며 부산시나 제주시를 찾는 관광객들의 많은 불만을 야기시키고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 해수인수관의 색상과 질감 그리고 그것을 관찰하는 행인이나 관찰자에 의한 두 가지 정보에 의하여 해안경관이 결정됨을 알 수 있었다.

본 연구는 국도의 경관구성요소인 산, 하늘, 도로포장면, 가로수, 논밭, 간판ㆍ전신주, 건물, 구조체, 비탈면, 방호ㆍ방음벽, 중앙분리대의 시각량 분석을 통하여 시대별 경관변화를 파악한 결과, 1.국도의 경관구성요소 중 각 시대별로 가장 높은 시각량을 나타낸 것은 도로포장면으로서 국도경관을 분석 평가함에 있어서 도로의 선형은 시각적으로 중요한 구성요소의 하나로 다루어져야 함을 알 수 있었다. 2.국도의 시대별 경관변화는 중앙분리대(F＝33.296)와 가로수(F＝32.881)에 의한 차이가 가장 두드러진 것으로 나타났으며, 다음 순으로는 하늘(F＝24.735)과 산(F＝23.477)이 유사한 정도의 차이값을 나타내고 있다. 그러나 건물과 구조체는 통계적으로 차이가 없음이 판명되었다. 3.국도건설은 점차적으로 자연적 요소의 감소와 인공적 요소에 의한 경관이 주를 이루게 됨을 알 수 있었다. 이는 아직까지 국도건설이 경관적ㆍ생태적 건강성을 인지하고 있음에도 불구하고 접근성과 이동성의 기능중심의 논리에서 벗어나지 못하고 있는 현실적 문제를 보여주는 결과이다.

경관은 생태적인 공간구조와 인간에 의산 시각상의 두 개의 다른 측면을 가진다. 따라서 경관평가는 그 양면에서 평가가 이루어져야 할 것이다. 본 연구는 무등산도립공원에 대하여 생태 및 시각 특성의 양면에서 경관평가를 시도하고, 이것과 현재의 용도지구를 검토하였다. 그 결과 보존가치가 매우 높게 평가된 지역이 자연환경 지구로 지정되어 있으며 보존가치가 낮게 평가된 지역이 자연보존지구내에 존재하는 등 불합리하게 지정되어 있음이 지적되었다. 또 자연공원의 관리계획상, 생태평가와 시각평가에 기초한 경관평가를 실시하여 그 결과를 반영한 보존위주의 보다 합리적인 용도지구안을 제시하였다.

현재 한라산 국립공원의 경관과 생태계를 보전하기 위하여 관리계획을 수립하고 있다. 국립공원 관리자와 지역주민들은 한라산 경관에 미치는 관리시책의 시각적 영향에 관심이 많다 계획과정에서 가장 중요한 측면의 하나는 제안된 관리시책의 수용여부를 판단할 수 있도록 관리시책의 영향을 정확하게 예측, 평가하는 것이다. 그러므로 국립공원 관리자나 일반대중이 국립공원관리시책의 경관영향을 예측, 평가할 수 있는 간편한 기법과 방법이 필요하다. 제안된 관리시책의 시각적 영향을 CCG 포토몽타쥬 기법에 의해 작성한 합성사진에 나타냈고 설문응답자들은 이 합성사진들을 7점 SD 척도로 평가했다. 이 연구를 통하여 CCG 포토몽타쥬 기법의 실용성, 훼손지 복구의 필요성, 제안된 복구시책의 타당성 등이 파악되었다. 이 연구에서 사용된 경관예측기법과 연구결과는 관리계획을 수립하고 그 계획과정에 주민을 참여시키는데 도움을 줄 것으로 생각한다.

오대산 국립공원의 삼림경관, 삼림 시설물 경관, 집단시설지구 경관, 사찰경관을 대상으로 물리적 환경이 지닌 환경적 질을 계량적 접근방법으로 분석하여 합리적인 이용개발 및 보전관리에 필요한 기초자료를 제시하는 것을 목적으로 심리량 분석을 취해 S.D.Scale을 측정하고 인자분석 알고리즘을 통하여 물리적 환경의 공간 이미지 구조를 밝혔으묘, 시각적 선호도를 측정하여 결정인자를 추출하였으며 각 인자 상호간의 중요성을 규명하였다. 오대산 국립공원의 공간 이미지를 함축하는 변인은 종합평가적 차원, 공간적 차원, 자연성 차원 및 물리적 차원, 호감성 차원 등 5개 인자군으로 분석되었으며 종합평가적 차워, 공간적 차원 및 호감성 차원의 인자가 공간 이미지를 대표하는 인자군으로 나타났다. 시각적 선호도를 결정짓는 주요 설명변수는 계곡물의 깨끗함과 상쾌함, 지형지세의 특이성, 등산로 설치의 자연스러움 및 사찰건물 외관과 주변 인공식생과의 어울림 등이 시각적 선호도 결정의 주요변수로 작용하고 있었다.

While cities became bigger and bigger since 1990s, many indiscretely high buildings started to be built in the mountain areas inside a city and in the rural areas in the suburb of each city. To regulate such indiscrete developments, the government prepared for some relevant legal and institutional criteria by having enacted the “Landscape Act” and established a strong management means in the legal and institutional aspects by having introduced the natural landscape deliberation system and the landscape deliberation one into the “Natural Environment Conservation Act.” However, since some uniform levels of absolute height and no. of stories are suggested legally and institutionally, it is hard to consider the effects of a real building structure onto the relevant landscape. Accordingly, this thesis is intended to grasp the contrast of the landscape elements in the allowable height section, which is presented through landscape sensitivity. As the results from the visual contrast rating on a small apartment complex located in Dangjin and a large scale of apartment complex in Seosan as the apartment complexes surrounded with natural landscapes that were selected as the subjects of this study, the following conclusion can be finalized. First, there were deducted some factors, that is, forms, lines, colors, textures and sizes as the ones with which can measure and evaluate the contrasting properties when a structure gets into a natural landscape. Second, in case of a small scale of apartment complex (in the foreground) compared to a large one (in the foreground), it was found that the contrasting properties were bigger. In addition, it was also found that the contrasting property of the landscape factor of the foreground compared to that of the middle one becomes bigger depending on a distance. Third, as the results from an evaluation on the contrasting properties of the landscape factor depending on the changes of each floor of a structure, it was found that the factors, that is, forms, lines, colors, textures and sizes are very significant. Among those factors, the factors, forms and lines in a small scale of apartment complex (in the foreground) showed each log regression. But in all of the other cases, they showed each line regression. Fourth, as the results from examining the regression coefficients of the landscape factor, the coefficients of the shapes and lines have similar coefficients and the colors and the textures have similar ones, too. In case of the sizes of apartment complexes, the colors and the textures of a large apartment complex (in the foreground) have similar coefficients, in case of that in the middle ground, the shapes and lines have similar coefficients. Fifth, as the results from estimating the contrasting properties of the landscape factor on the floors within the allowed scope of the landscape sensitivity, it was found that the contrasting property was 3.5 to 4.9 in case of a small scale of apartment complex (in the foreground), but 2.5to 3.7 in case of a small scale of one. In case of a large scale of apartment complex, the value was 3.5 to 5.3, but in case of a large one in the middle ground was 2.9 to 4.9. Sixth, it was comprehended that the contrasting properties of the landscape factor become different depending on each size of apartment complex and the distance of a view point. In this study, it is intended to find the meaning from the aspect that the results can be used as the baseline data for comprehending a proper range of heights of structures objectively during a natural landscape deliberation or a landscape deliberation.

While the significance and need of landscape assessment for rural area has been recognised, an appropriate method has not been established due to the lack of statutory ground and policy status in Korea. For that reason, current studies have been limited to dominantly amenity field survey in specific rural areas and stayed in academic. In particular, the majority of research on rural landscape amenity or character assessment methodologies so far has been attempted with quantitative processes. Such quantitative methods produced sometimes, heavily overlapped, conflicted, and not much meaningful characterisation and classification. Moreover, such results could not only have been reflected to policy implementation but provide vision for rural areas. Therefore, this study offers new facets for landscape character assessment methods through the lens of practitioners’ qualitative survey methods and moreover, seek a policy implementation of newly developed methodologies. In order to carry out such analysis, the study employed a case study of England’s Landscape Character Assessment and survey location was Gateshead Council, Northeast of England. The study suggests meaningful qualitative landscape character assessment method and review of its policy implementation.

For rural landscape management to run in virtuous circle, the present study has paid attention to the roles and activities of local residents and administration, which are the main sectors of managing landscape. In this respect, this study is aimed to arrange the roles of local residents and administration for landscape management and propose the basic data necessary to develope evaluation index for effectiveness of rural landscape policy. Key findings and implications are as follows. First, literature reviews of 18 landscape management studies found 37 administrative roles and 7 roles of local residents. And those roles were classified into 3 factors by similar concept: 'local government support system', 'landscape management planning', and 'promoting the participation of residents'. Second, two Delphi surveys were conducted with landscape experts to verify the validity of those evaluation items by sector. Third, factor analysis was carried out to analyze the hierarchical structure of those evaluation items. 3 sub-factors were extracted from 'local government support system' sector; 2 sub-factors from the 'landscape management planning' sector; and 4 sub-factors from the 'promoting participation of residents' sector. Fourth, the hierarchy of those evaluation factors was divided into high and low classes and sub-indexes were structured to examine the relative importance of each class and assign a relative weight on each index. The most important sub-factors were turned out as follows: 'local residents' will to practice landscape activities (0.112)', 'local government budget for rural landscape management (0.088), and 'restriction on buildings by village regulation (0.068). It indicates the viewpoints of the landscape experts that local residents' voluntary participation in landscape activities and agreement of local residents on landscape management by village, e.g. village regulation, are preconditions for successful landscape management. In addition, it is significant for a local government to secure the budget of landscape management to support local residents support.

Due to the Korea's topographic characteristic, there are a lot of marine bridges to connect between islands and mainland. In addition, marine bridges play an important role in a regional landscape. For these reasons, landscape design of bridge is necessary in order to improve beautification of region. So, this studies analyzed image and landscape preference of marine bridges in rural area. The main results were summarized as follows: When rating the image of the background in sea and mountain image, ‘stable’ and ‘natural’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the arch bridge in sea and mountain image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the cable-stayed bridge in sea and mountain image, ‘splendid’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the suspension bridge in sea and mountain image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘splendid’ were rated highly. Next, When rating the image of the background in sea and building image, ‘stable’ and ‘natural’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the arch bridge in sea and building image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘splendid’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the cable-stayed bridge in sea and building image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the suspension bridge in sea and building image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. And, The image of suspension bridges in sea and mountain image is more highly preferred than other image. The background in sea and mountain image is landscape of the lowest preference. In the mountain and sea image, the preference of suspension bridge landscape has the highest rating. In the sea and building image, the preference of arch bridge landscape has the highest rating. In conclusion, the results illustrate that the marine bridge's shape and its background in rural area are important elements of a visual preference. When designing the marine bridge, designer have to choose a proper bridge shape for its background. However, this research's limitation is that this research consider only bridge shape and background to analyze landscape preference of marine bridges. Therefore, further research is necessary to consider various elements.

Improve the rural views of the Government and the municipalities with the intention of rural landscape planning. However, rural scenery evaluation of landscape types and element categories, landscape scenes, such as the valuation of resources selected, form a coherent system and ecological point of view is not only a Visual perspective of evaluation, or evaluation is made. This study evaluates the rural landscape through the rural landscape for rurality is implemented can explain the image. Rural amenity 100 represented the rural landscape in rurality with photos of photos, and scenes, photos, location-based rural Vista rurality landscapes drawn components. Selected landscape photography scenic landscapes in the u.s. survey and image vocabularies through surveys is representative of the landscape in rurality of each Vista location-specific photos and images began extracted factors. As a result, the Distant view is a town and village in the rolling hills of the surrounding environment is an image behind the Vista Skyline, Farmland Rural village forests, Behind the hills, Individual housing roof, Housing arrangement, The number of household includes landscape components. Factor analysis ‘openness’, ‘intimacy’, ‘activity’, ‘complexity’, ‘safety’ was down to five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 66.45 percent. Middle distance view is close to being out of town houses and village environment, an image in the skyline hills Vista, farmlands, village forests, rolling hills, behind the scenes of the housing component of the neck, the sperm will honor an individual factor analysis results are ‘intimacy’, ‘safety’, ‘openness’, ‘specificity’, ‘complexity’ five factors the whole description of the capacity factors compared to 67.24 percent. Close-range view is mainly in Vista village embraced the individual elements and an image of a harmonious location in the surroundings of the sperm, individual houses, fences, gates, courtyard, Garden, garage, agricultural facilities, including, but not limited to, factors assay but an ‘intimacy’, ‘complexity’, ‘safety’, ‘activity’, ‘openness’ five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 65.29%. This research seeks to determine the extent to which rurality of rural landscape Vista by location attributes and elements and representative officer in photo selection and rurality to extract the image. To date, followed by a comprehensive study, which was presented through the readjustment could not overlook the Visual elements. The future rural development officer for the evaluation of rural landscape classification and quantitative and objective assessment will have to come up with ways to do.

The purpose of this research is first, to define what measurement items in terms of subjective consideration and preference can be used to assess the landscape values of agriculture and fisheries heritage, and second, to understand the perceptive patterns particularly how landscape experts weigh up the importance of the each measurement item. In order to extract the measurement items, extensive literature review was performed including research documents as well as domestic and international policy reports. A survey targeting the experts was conducted to ask their opinions on the importance of the selected items. For the analysis, SPSS 20.0 for Windows was used to carry out reliability analysis, descriptive statistics such as arithmetic mean and frequency distribution, factor analysis, and multiple linear regression modeling. The results are: the importance value of the landscape values in agriculture and fisheries heritage was 4.1494; the ratio value that the experts perceived the importance was 87.2%; and the average of the importance value of the analyzed items was 3.71. All the items have more than 3.00. Ten factor groups were summarized and defined whose total explanation power was 67.86%. The factor groups were named as lyricism, authenticity, environmentally-friendliness, durability, recognizability, regionality, visibility, value of sightseeing, social image, and universality. The factors influencing the landscape values are, in order of importance, recognizability, authenticity, visibility, universality, durability, and nativeness. According to the analysis, however, environmentally-friendliness, regionality, value of sightseeing, and social image were not as important.

This study has intended to build a rural landscape evaluation model based on an integrated landscape assessment paradigm of rural region using an additive integration index method and applied the model to the Seondong Region of Gochang-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea. To reach this goal, this study developed a model to calculate Integrated Landscape Assessment Index. The model has employed the Objective Landscape Index, the Subjective Landscape Index, and the weighted values, and was applied to the Seondong region. This study has found the following results: 1) forests and water spaces were assessed with relatively better visual preferences and better landscape ecosystem; 2) the historic cultural area and scenic agriculture as well as general farm land were assessed with moderate ratings; and, 3) the villages included in development plan, their adjacent arable farming land, and the village watercourses were forming relatively poorer landscape.