In this study, the evaluation items related to the effectiveness evaluation of the LVC (Live, Virtual, Constructive) training system of the Air Force were derived and the weights of each item were analyzed. The LVC training system evaluation items for AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis were divided into three layers, and according to the level, 3 items were derived at level 1, 11 items at level 2, and 33 items at level 3. For weight analysis of evaluation items, an AHP-based pairwise comparison questionnaire was conducted for Air Force experts related to the LVC training system. As a result of the survey, related items such as (1) Achievement of education and training goals (53.8%), (1.2) Large-scale mission and operational performance (25.5%), and (1.2.1) Teamwork among training participants (19.4%) was highly rated. Also, it was confirmed that the weights of evaluation items were not different for each expert group, that is, the priority for importance was evaluated in the same order between the policy department and the working department. Through these analysis results, it will be possible to use them as evaluation criteria for new LVC-related projects of the Air Force and selection of introduction systems.

PURPOSES : The purpose of this study was to investigate directions for future smart city transportation policies and service development by evaluating road service satisfaction levels and predicting future service demand. METHODS : A nationwide survey was conducted in Korea to develop a transportation service evaluation system based on the functions and objects of transportation. The satisfaction level of road service was evaluated using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP), promising service sectors were identified using the revised importance-performance analysis (IPA) technique, and detailed service demands by sector were suggested. RESULTS : The most valuable service value felt by the people was "safety" (weight 0.4), and the overall satisfaction level was 68.9 points, slightly exceeding "normal." As a result of analyzing the promising service sectors by dividing them into urban and rural areas, "handicapped, elderly, and pedestrians" were important in both areas, and "road facility maintenance" was classified as an additional promising sector for rural areas. CONCLUSIONS : People demand that future smart city transportation policies and services should be "people" and "safety" centered. In addition, it is necessary to pay attention not only to the development of new services but also to the improvement of problems with existing services and policies.

The railroad facilities are intended for long-term operation as the initial acquisition costs necessary for infrastructure construction are high. Therefore, regular maintenance of railroad facilities is essential, and furthermore, system reliability through systematic performance evaluation is required. In this study, the signal control system of railroad electrical equipment was selected as the subject of research and the performance evaluation target facility selection study was conducted using AHP. The results of the study can contribute to the reliability of the signal control system as well as to the reliability of the railroad system, which is a higher system.

본 연구를 통해 애완곤충산업에 이용될 수 있는 곤충 종에 대한 평가지표를 개발하였다. 분석 방법으로는 전문가 의견조사인 델파이 (Delphi) 방법을 이용하여 4개의 대분류와 9개의 중분류로 구성된 평가항목을 도출하였다. 또한, 계층분석과정(AHP)을 활용하여 애완곤충 종을 선발하기 위한 평가기준을 마련하였고, 적용 시험을 통해 점수의 체계화를 구축하였다.

Failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA) is popular approach applied to examine potential failures in equipment designs and maintenance of equipments. Risk Priority Number(RPN) is used as an index for the criticality of fault modes in FMEA and RCM(reliability centered maintenance). Traditional RPN approach does not have much credit as a index for the criticality because it does not reflect their experience and the governing logic is apart from their knowledge. Multiple Criteria Decision Method(MCDM) is a proven approach applied to evaluate multiple conflicting criteria in decision making. MCDM can be applied as a tool for RPN evaluation. This study was carried out to investigate application of Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) in evaluating RPN.

해양항공드론은 해양사고의 예방과 대응에 이용할 수 있는 새로운 장비이다. 이러한 해양항공드론을 배치하기 위한 관할구역을 결정하는 것은 정부 의사결정자가 효과적인 정책을 마련하도록 도움을 줄 수 있다. 이 연구의 목적은 F-AHP법과 ARAS법을 이용하여 해양항공드론을 배치하기 위한 적절한 구역을 평가하는 모델을 개발하기 위한 것이다. 그리고 이 제안된 모델의 적용가능성을 확인하기 위해 우리나라 해양경찰청의 관할구역에 적용하였다. 해양항공드론의 배치는 평가요소 사이에 중복이 높은 특징이 있기 때문에 식별된 평가항목의 중요도를 결정하기 위해서 F-AHP법을 이용하였다. 그 결과 해양드론의 배치에 있어서 연안에서의 실종자 항목이 가장 중요 한 평가항목으로 나타났다. 또한 이 연구에서 지역 해양경찰서의 우선순위는 하나의 목표(해양사고 50 % 저감)를 고려할 수 있는 ARAS법을 이용하였다. 그 결과로서 목포 해양경찰서 관할구역의 우선순위가 가장 높게 나타났고, 인천, 서귀포, 태안, 완도, 여수, 포항, 통영, 군산, 보령, 제주, 부안, 동해, 속초, 울산, 울진, 부산, 창원, 평택 해양경찰서 관할구역 순으로 나타났다.

This study focuses on developing a theoretical framework for evaluating Operational Performance of the Marine Forest Creation project on a balanced and comprehensive perspective by using BSC, AHP, and IPA. Also, the purpose of this study is empirically to analyze operational performance of the project and to suggest the future improvement plan. For this purpose, We will first determine the critical success factors(CSF) and key performance indicators(KPI) required for evaluating the performance of the Marine Forest Creation project from the four perspectives of BSC. And, After determining the weight for each of CSF, KPI, and four perspectives of BSC by using AHP, we will measure the project performance. We will also conduct IPA analysis to propose the direction of improvement of the Marine Forest Creation project. The results of this study are as follows. First, this study has drawn 8 critical success factors and 16 key performance indicators for four BSC perspectives based on the theoretical considerations and expert interview survey. Second, as a result of deriving relative importance of BSC perspectives using AHP, customer perspective was the highest, followed by financial perspective, learning and growth perspective, and internal process perspective. Third, as the results of analyzing the importance and performance of BSC perspectives using IPA, customer perspective was the maintenance reinforcement category, financial perspective was the key improvement category, internal process perspective and learning and growth perspective were gradual improvement category. This study has a great academic significance in terms of BSC first tried to evaluate the performance of the Marine Forest Creation project. The results of this study are expected to lead to various discussions for a balanced and comprehensive verification of Marine Forest Creation project performance.

본 연구에서는 연안여객선의 지간선 체계 구축 사업의 추진을 위한 권역 및 항로를 선정 평가하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 타 교통수단의 위계형성 구조 및 연안여객선 운영체계의 특성을 분석하여 구축 대상권역 및 대상항로 선정을 위한 평가항목을 추출한다. 두번째는 전문가 설문조사를 통해 구축 대상권역 및 대상항로의 평가항목에 대하여 AHP기법을 이용하여 중요도를 산출한다. 마지막으로 평가항목에 대한 중요도와 대상권역 및 항로를 종합평가하여 최종 후보권역 및 항로를 선정하고자 한다. 그 결과 대상권역은 항로수, 여객수송실적, 차량수송실적, 도서민수 등 4개의 평가항목이 추출되었고, 이들 항목으로 평가한 결과 목포권역이 선정되었다. 또한 도서민, 지자체, 지역적 여건, 여객선 사업자 등 4개의 평가항목으로 평가한 결과 영광권 항로가 선정되었다. 한편 확대시행을 위해서는 터미널 시설 확충, 대형 선박의 확보 및 (준)공영제 도입등과 함께 단계적인 추진이 필요하다.

기술이 발달하고 기업환경이 급변하면서 중소기업의 기술혁신활동에 있어 지식서비스를 효과적으로 활용하는 것에 대한 사회적 요구가 급증하고 있다. 현재 지식서비스 의 형태로 중소기업에 제공되고 있는 서비스의 경우 창업지원, 연구개발 기획, 연구개발 수행, 기타 지원서비스에 이르기까지 중소기업 현장에서 일어나고 있는 기업 활동의 다양한 활동을 광범위하게 포함하고 있다. 이러한 지식서비스의 제공 현황과 범위는 지식서비스를 지원하는 기관의 특성에 따라 다소 차이를 보이고 있으나 대부분 핵심 서비스의 제공 측면에서는 유사한 성향을 보이며, 이는 각 지원기관의 특성에 따른 차별화가 부족하다는 것을 시사 하고 있다. 그러나 지식서비스 제공 기관이 기관 특성 및 역량에 맞는 효과적 서비스를 제공 하기 위해서는 핵심 지식서비스를 발굴하고 이를 중점적으로 제공하는 것이 필수적으로 요구된다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 다양한 중소기업 정책 및 지원사업을 제공하고 있는 KISTI 중소기업지식본부를 대상으로, 중소기업에 제공되어야 할 가장 적합한 지식서비스를 탐색하고, 핵심 지식서비스를 도출하며, 도출된 핵심 지식서비스에 대한 구체적인 서비스 모델을 제안하고자 한다.

This study with the aim to develop a system that can be objectively measured and evaluated as a scientific support and of R&D. To this end, this study aimed at companies participating in the development of national technology transfer support program for SMEs examined the factors affecting performance. By developing metrics that meet the business objectives refer to the applicable national and international case studies and literature reviews, etc. In order to achieve the systematization of technology evaluation index, which was selected indicators. To evaluate the weight through the duality comparing selected indicators in order to take advantage of the AHP analysis conducted targeted surveys.

This study is about implementing an job matching web service system based on the Job seeker’s company assessment model proposed by the researchers. Basically, the Job seekers’ company assessment model is based on the concept that each job seeker can evaluate the recruitment company candidates using job seekers’s own major consideration factors. Using the implemented information system, each job seeker’s main considerations in job searching process are evaluated and stored and compared to those of other job seekers’ or groups’ characterized by sex, job experience residential area and etc. by finding out and listing up the companies in the order of the preference of job seeker own or belonging groups, job seekers can be helped to find suitable companies which fit well to themselves.

Technology-oriented national R&D programs produce intellectual property as their final result. Patents, as typical industrial intellectual property, are therefore considered an important factor when evaluating the outcome of R&D programs. Among the main components of patent evaluation, in particular, the patent right quality is a key component constituting patent value, together with marketability and usability. Current approaches for patent right quality evaluation rely mostly on intrinsic knowledge of patent attorneys, and the recent rapid increase of national R&D patents is making expert-based evaluation costly and time-consuming. Therefore, this study defines a hierarchy of patent right quality and then proposes how to quantify the evaluation process of patent right quality by combining text mining and regression analysis. This study will contribute to understanding of the systemic view of the patent right quality evaluation, as well as be an efficient aid for evaluating patents in R&D program assessment processes.

This study is conducted to suggest ways to mitigate the mismatch phenomenon between job seekers who want to find right company for themselves and companies looking for appropriate new employees. For this purpose, this study improves the company assessment framework reflecting job seekers interests by using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. The improved evaluation framework is a three-level hierarchical structure, where there are 4 groups at the top level, 12 factors at the intermediate level and 36 indexes at the bottom level. For the empirical analysis of the applicants preferences based on the improved model, a survey for F-AHP analysis is carried out to university students and then priorities of components in the evaluation model are calculated. Moreover, the differences of priority of the company assessment framework are analyzed for different genders, college years, and major divisions. The results show that job seekers’ most concerning factors are wages, stability, working environments, and labor deal, which are ranked highly in this order and the differences in preferences for each type of job seekers (genders, college years, and major divisions) are obvious. The results also show that the male prefers wages to environment, on the other hand female does working environment to wages.

Because of the changing educational environments, Korean universities have to stand up to the challenge of enhancing their performances in educational activities. Therefore, Korean universities should seek ways to improve its competitiveness. The evaluation of Korean universities has been conducted by the Government and other media agencies like JoongAng’s Daily to promote the development of universities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the relative efficiency of Korean universities using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) models. To produce reasonable results, major input and output variables have been determined in a step using a Profiling method, Spearman correlation analysis and AHP model. Also, this study shows that the relative efficiency for Korean universities is obtained not only based on quantity of output, but also on the basis of the quality of the output. Drawing upon the results of the analysis, this study provides a comprehensive and practical method for evaluating the performance of universities in terms of efficiency.

정부는 신성장동력 창출을 통한 국가 경쟁력 강화와 일자리 창출을 목적으로 매년 연구개발(R&D)부문 의 투자를 확대하고 있으며, 해마다 늘어나는 연구개발예산을 보다 효율적으로 관리하고 불필요한 투자를 미연에 방지하기 위한 평가지침의 개발이 요구되는 실정이다. 우리나라의 경우 현재 ʻ연구개발 부문 사업의 예비타당성조사 지침ʼ과 ʻ기술가치평가 실무가이드ʼ를 통해 연구개발사업의 평가를 진행하고 있으나 녹색도로기술의 개발과 같은 소규모 연구개발 사업에 대한 평가 지침은 부재한 실정이다. 이러한 문제점의 해결방안으로 ʻ탄소중립형 도로 기술개발ʼ 연구단에서는 소규모 연구개발 사업의 개발효과 및 타당성을 검토할 수 있는 투자평가시스템을 개발하고 있으며, 본 연구에서 는 해당 투자평가 시스템 중 정성적 분석을 통해 연구개발의 타당성을 분석 할 수 있는 분석기법을 중점 적으로 다루고자 한다. 녹색도로기술의 상위 개념인 연구개발 사업의 평가결과를 살펴보면 정량적 분석결과와 정성적 분석결 과가 혼합되어 있으며, 정량화된 경우에도 평가항목별로 상이한 척도의 결과가 도출되어 이에 대한 통합 과정이 필요하다. 녹색도로기술 또한 이와 크게 다르지 않을 것으로 예상되며 이에 따라 녹색도로 기술 투자평가 시스템 또한 종합결론을 도출하기 위한 평가방법이 필요하다. 기존부터 이러한 다양한 속성들을 종합적으로 고려하는 다기준의사결정(MCDM: Multi-Criteria Decision Making)에 대한 연구가 이루어 져 왔다. 다기준의사결정은 크게 다목적의사결정법(MODM: Multiple Objective Decision Making)과 다 속성의사결정법(MADM: Multiple Attribute Decision Making)으로 나뉜다. 두 가지 의사결정법의 큰 차 이는 대안의 개수의 차이이며, 일반적인 투자사업의 의사결정의 경우 대안의 수가 유한할 뿐 아니라 유한 개의 대안들 중에서 우선순위나 선호를 가장 잘 반영하는 대안을 찾아내는 것이 핵심 목표이므로 MADM 기법을 중심으로 연구에 적합한 다기준분석 기법을 설계하였다. 평가대상은 ʻ탄소중립형 도로 기술개발ʼ 연구단에서 개발 중에 있는 녹색도로기술을 대상으로 하였으며, 본 연구의 결과를 통해 향후 소규모 녹색도로기술의 개발 활성화 및 중복기술에 대한 예산 절감효과를 얻 을 수 있을 것이라 판단된다.

Recently, conservation and utilization of cultural heritage has been regarded as importance. So, various research papers about maintenance of the remains have been presented in many conferences. But most of researches have focused on introduction about maintenance methods and explanation about maintenance concepts of remains. And even in case of a few papers treated post-evaluation about maintenance of the remains the criteria of the evaluation has tended to somewhat subjective. So, the purpose of this study is to show the objective post-evaluation indexes which was developed by Delphi · AHP methods. This research was proceeded in two stages. First, we arranged the evaluation index in a hierarchy to be made through the analyses about references and researches about maintenance of remains. 304 evaluation articles were elicited through the process. And then, elicited evaluation articles were classified with 'conservation' and 'utilization'. Second step was to figure out importance and validity of hierarchical evaluation articles with twice questionnaire surveys. This research used interval scale to comprehend validity and AHP method to evaluate relative importance of each other articles.

In this study, the evaluation criteria of performance and applicability is developed to rank the combinatorial technologies for SWG (Smart Water Grid) system using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. Security, safety, solution, suitability and sustainability which are goals of SWG technology, are used as upper level hierarchy elements. And three detailed elements for each upper level hierarchy are adopted as the lower level hierarchy. The weighted value which represents the importance of each element, could be determined through questionnaires accomplished by groups of specialists who are engaged in relevant waster industry and research area. To assess the accuracy of the evaluation criteria developed in this study, a simulation on four decision alternatives for smart water grid was carried out as an evaluation. Consequently which showed 90 % of accuracy.