In this study, we analyzed how the revenue water ratio(RWR) is affected by changes in conditions of the water supply area, such as the ratio of aging pipes, maintenance conditions, and revenue water. As a result of analyzing the impact of pipe aging and maintenance conditions on the RWR, it was confirmed that the RWR could be decreased if the pipe replacement project to improve the aging pipe ratio was not carried out and proper maintenance costs were not secured. It was also confirmed that an increase in the revenue water could be operated to facilitate the achievement of the project’s target RWR. In contrast, a decrease in the revenue water due to a population reduction could affect the failure of the target RWR. In addition to analyzing the causes of variation in the RWR, the calculation of estimated project costs was considered by using leakage reduction instead of RWR from recent RWR improvement project cost data. From this analysis, it was reviewed whether the project costs planned to achieve the target RWR of the RWR improvement project in A city were appropriate. In conclusion, the RWR could be affected by variations in the ratio of aging pipes, maintenance conditions, and revenue water, and it was reasonable to consider not only the construction input but also the input related to RWR improvement, such as leakage reduction, when calculating the project cost.

본 연구는 K연구원의 상향식 R&D과제기획 차원의 신규 연구기획과제 선정 평가를 위한 평가도구 개발에 목적을 두고 진행하였다. 이를 위해 CIPP모형과 연구기획평가를 위한 선정평가 및 평가지표에 관한 선행연구를 중심으로 R&D과제기획 선정평가 항목과 문항을 개발 한 후, 2회에 걸친 델파이 조사를 실시하였다. 개발된 평가도구는 13명의 전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 내용타당도, 합의도 및 수렴도를 검증하였다. 최종 선정된 R&D과제기획 선정평가 도구는 8개 항목에 총 21개 문항으로, 상황평가 5 문항, 투입평가 2문항, 과정평가 8문항, 산출평가 6문항으로 구성되었다. 개발된 평가 도구는 상향식 기획 과정상의 문제점을 해소하고 연구자들의 기획역량을 제고하는 데 기여할 것이다. 또한, 선정 평가 시 평가에 대한 일관성과 효율성 제고에 기여할 것이다.

Since 2011, a total length of national highway in Korea is 13,797km and 97.6% of total length of national highway system is paved. Particularly, most of national highway has been paved as asphalt concrete pavement. Currently, many maintenance techniques, such as overlay and surface treatments, are applied on existing pavements depending on the failure levels of pavements. One of maintenance techniques is a hot in-place recycling (HIR) that shows features of cost effective and better performance because of the use of 100% recycling of reclaimed asphalt of existing pavement. HIR is widely used in Europe countries and the U.S. It is recommended to rehabilitate the old and distressed asphalt pavement because it is suitable from the environmental perspective and convenient to use when a road is paved. Since 2002, HIR as a maintenance method has been used to rehabilitate the distressed asphalt pavement in National highway in Korea. Recently, a new HIR system, which consists of three pre-heaters, two recycler and one paver, is introduced in maintenance project in National highway. In this paper, HIR mixtures collected from a new HIR system in the field are tested to evaluate their performance in the laboratory test. First, the reclaimed asphalt (RAP) materials and HIR mixtures are collected in the field project site. Second, the quality evaluation of RAP materials, HIR mixtures and rejuvenator are conducted in the laboratory. Test results of RAP materials and HIR mixtures are satisfied with national specification. Rejuvenator used in the project site is classified as RA-5. Based on the limited teste results, it would be concluded that a new HIR system could be produced a satisfied HIR mixtures in the maintenance projects of National highway.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of the weight values of evaluation items by traffic safety project type. METHODS: In general, a large-scale investment in projects such as the traffic safety project requires economic analyses to be performed in advance. However, there is an argument for considering special characteristics of the traffic safety project. Therefore, this study conducted characteristic analysis of the weight values of evaluation items. The analysis consisted of two steps. The first step was hypothesis verification using analysis of variance (ANOVA). In this process, the authors examined whether the weight of evaluation items is the same regardless of the traffic safety project type. Based on the first step's results, the authors proceeded to the second step. The objective of this step was to analyze how different the weight values are by traffic safety project type using an analytic hierarchy process. RESULTS: According to the ANOVA test results, the benefit to cost ratios have different weight values based on traffic safety project type at the 0.01 significance level. The policy evaluation items, such as the plans connection, resident opinion, and regional equity, also showed the same results except that the result for the related plans connection was statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Based on the first step's result, the AHP analysis in the second step showed that the traffic safety projects for vulnerable users and pedestrians have very low weight values in economic evaluation factors compared with other safety project types. The weight values for vulnerable users and pedestrians were 0.29 and 0.26, respectively, in economic evaluation items. On the other hand, the weight values for other safety project types were around 0.6. Among the policy evaluation items, resident opinion showed a higher weight value than other factors, such as connection and regional equity items. CONCLUSIONS: The social and economic impact of a traffic safety project varies by project type and project characteristics. Although the economic approach is overarching and a reasonable methodology is applied for large-scale projects, it should be noted that the safety issue, especially for transportation of vulnerable uses, requires a non-economical approach. Based on the analysis results, this study suggests that the priority of the projects should be determined by separating them into independent assessment groups depending on their characteristics.

This study focuses on developing a theoretical framework for evaluating Operational Performance of the Marine Forest Creation project on a balanced and comprehensive perspective by using BSC, AHP, and IPA. Also, the purpose of this study is empirically to analyze operational performance of the project and to suggest the future improvement plan. For this purpose, We will first determine the critical success factors(CSF) and key performance indicators(KPI) required for evaluating the performance of the Marine Forest Creation project from the four perspectives of BSC. And, After determining the weight for each of CSF, KPI, and four perspectives of BSC by using AHP, we will measure the project performance. We will also conduct IPA analysis to propose the direction of improvement of the Marine Forest Creation project. The results of this study are as follows. First, this study has drawn 8 critical success factors and 16 key performance indicators for four BSC perspectives based on the theoretical considerations and expert interview survey. Second, as a result of deriving relative importance of BSC perspectives using AHP, customer perspective was the highest, followed by financial perspective, learning and growth perspective, and internal process perspective. Third, as the results of analyzing the importance and performance of BSC perspectives using IPA, customer perspective was the maintenance reinforcement category, financial perspective was the key improvement category, internal process perspective and learning and growth perspective were gradual improvement category. This study has a great academic significance in terms of BSC first tried to evaluate the performance of the Marine Forest Creation project. The results of this study are expected to lead to various discussions for a balanced and comprehensive verification of Marine Forest Creation project performance.

The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Livestock and Food in Korea has done an R&D project to develop new corn and soybean varieties and cultivation technologies with Seoul National University and on-site company for three years in Russia, where Korean government has done the overseas’ agriculture for more than a decade. The objective of this study is to analyze the investment value of three years’ funding. For this, a Cost-Benefit and Scenario analysis approaches were used. The results revealed that 1) For the case of soybean, cost seems to outweigh benefits under a pessimistic scenario, but otherwise in case of neutral and optimistic scenarios. 2) The result of corn shows high economic efficiency for all scenarios. 3) The most important implication of this study is that Korea’s oversea agriculture R&D projects need to expand to different countries, regions, and crops.

PURPOSES: This study supports the evidence that it is possible to rehabilitate a damaged pavement with a lane closure specifically based on the Gimcheon~Sunsan project. METHODS : The prediction results from the simulation programs were compared with field monitoring, which focused on traffic management planning, congestion (length, time, and passing speed), bypass, and user cost, among others. RESULTS : The research results showed that lane closure application and pavement repair of the aged pavement in Korea were possible, even though the prediction results were minimally different from the field monitoring. The road agency contributes to service life extension of the rehabilitated pavement using this method. CONCLUSIONS: A marginal effect caused by the lane closure was observed on travelling users or vehicles, and the user cost of pavement repair decreased. Therefore, introducing the repair method or rehabilitation in Korea is possible. Information dissemination through various media was properly done to execute the project well. Moreover, the construction area traffic utilized nearby alternative roads. Therefore, improving the repaired pavemen’s service life while ensuring that the pavement management agency can provide a road with comfortable user riding quality was possible.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the economic validity of artificial reefs facilities and seeds release programs in Jeju Trial Sea Farm Project for raising fishing people’s revenue. The results of this study show the artificial reefs facilities and seeds release programs have net present value of 15,962.63 million won, internal rate of retrurn 13.86%, and benefit-cost of 1.912 under a 5.5% social discount rate. This suggests that in Jeju trial sea farm project, artificial reefs facilities and seeds release programs increase fisherperson’s revenue.

최근 현대 무기체계는 최첨단 기술로 인한 무기체계 개발 속도 증가와 획득환경의 다변화와 더불어 이에 대한 위험도 동시에 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라 미국방부는 무기체계의 수명주기를 고려하여 시험평가를 지속 적용토록 강조하고 있다. 따라서 기존의 무기체계 시험평가 프로세스에서 다루는 시스템 설계에 대한 위험 관리 활동의 강화의 필요성 역시 강조되고 있다. 그 중에서도 무기체계 개발의 탐색개발 및 체계개발 단계는 양산에 들어가기 전의 최종 활동으로서 제대로 수행되어야만 초기에 의도한 무기체계 개발의 목적을 달성할 수 있을 것이다. 본 논문에서는 위험 관리 활동을 고려한 시험평가 프로세스의 개선사항 도출과 모델링을 통해 무기체계 시스템인 무기체계를 대상으로 적용 및 조정 구축에 대한 내용을 기술하고 있다. 본 연구의 결과를 토대로 향후 시험평가 시 위험관리에 대한 투자를 통해 전체 프로젝트의 기간 단축 및 비용 절감과 안전성 확보를 개선시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

KAFACI 회원국들의 농업은 아프리카 지역의 특성상 농업유형이 매우 다양하며, 회원국들간의 농업 생산성, 기술, 잠재력 등의 편차도 매우 크게 나타나고 있다. 이 논문에서는 KAFACI 사업을 대상으로 DAC가 제시한 개발(원조)사업 평가항목 중 적절성과 효율성을 중심으로 평가하였다. 이 사업의 적절성 평가결과 및 제고방안는 다음과 같다. 첫째,KAFACI 사업의 목표는 적절하게 수립되었으나, 비전 설정은재검토 될 필요성이 있다. 즉, 국격 제고는 이 사업의 간접적인 효과이므로 이 자체가 비전으로 설정되는 것 보다는 개도국의 기아 및 빈곤 퇴치를 비전으로 설정하고, 이를 위한 목표로서 다자간 농업협력을 강화하는 방향으로 수립될 필요성이 있다. 둘째, 이 사업의 대상은 아프리카 지역 국가의 농식품 기술 발전을 선도하기 위하여 우리나라 주도로 구축하는KAFACI에 참여의사를 밝힌 국가 중심으로 적합하게 선정되었다. 셋째, 이 사업은 본질적으로 아프리카 빈곤 해결을 위한농업기술 지원이라는 차원에서 출발하였기 때문에 이를 실현하기 위한 다양한 접근노력은 매우 높이 평가된다. 또한 이사업은 아프리카 대륙 전체적으로 그리고 사업에 참여하고 있는 각 나라들이 공통적으로 목표하고 있는 식량문제 해결에초점을 두고 있기 때문에 사업 대상국들의 개발 정책과 매우부합하다. 넷째, G20 정상회의 개최 및 DAC 가입 등 국제사회에서 한국의 역할 급부상 및 ODA 확대 요구가 점증하고있는 현실에서 MDGs 등 국제지원전략과의 부합성이 매우 높다. 다섯째, 이 사업은 ‘한-아프리카 개발협력 기본 구상’ 의구체적인 실천 사례로서 우리나라 정부의 대외 개발협력정책과 매우 부합하며, 개도국에 대한 기술원조 공여국으로서의 국격 제고에 기여하였고, 중장기적으로는 농식품산업의 국외 진출 및 시장 확대 효과가 매우 클 것으로 평가된다. 향후 적절성 제고 방안으로는 기존 아프리카 녹색혁명의 실패 요인을심도 있게 분석함과 동시에 새로운 아프리카 녹색혁명을 위한국제사회 노력에 부합하도록 하여야 한다. 이 사업의 효율성 평가결과 및 제고방안은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 국제 농업협력에 대한 중앙부처, KOTRA, ODA 사업을 검토한 결과 내역사업 단위에서 유사·중복성은 없었다. 이는그동안 농진청 중심으로 국제농업협력 사업이 추진되어 왔으며, 사업 추진을 위한 실질적인 전문성을 구비하고 있기 때문이다. 둘째, 한-아프리카 농식품기술협력협의체 사업의 추진주체는 농촌진흥청으로 명확하며, KAFACI 총회, 아프리카형 농업생산성 제고를 위한 사업, 회원국 확대 및 다자간 사업 확대 등 주요 추진사업 주체 또한 명확하기 때문에 관련 추진주체간의 협의·조정 여부도 효율적으로 추진되었다. 그러나 기존의 농촌진흥청 국제기술협력과 외에 2008년 국외농업팀의신설로 국제업무를 2개과에서 수행하고 있지만 실제 집행하는예산과 전문인력에 한계가 큰 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 한-아프리카 농식품 기술협력 협의체(KAFACI)의 2011 세부업무 추진계획을 보면, 1) 조직기반 구축, 2) 총회 개최, 3) 국제기구와 공동 워크숍 개최, 4) 고위급 훈련과정 개최, 5) 개별 연수(OJT) 실시 6) 국가 프로젝트 협약 체결, 7) 신규 회원국 확보, 8) 예산 확보 등이었다. 그리고 이에 대한 평가 역시 신규회원국 및 예산 확보를 제외한 모든 사업이 계획대로 추진되었음을 알 수 있다. 향후 효율성 제고 방안으로는 서로를 알고 시작하는 ‘지피지기’전략 추진체계를 구축, 성과평가에 의한 지원시스템 구축, 타 개발협력기관과의 네트워크 강화 등에 주력해야 한다. 이와 함께 사업 평가를 위한 세부지표 및측정 방법론의 개발과 아울러 수원국의 주민, 전문가, 관련 공무원 등의 광범위한 설문조사 등의 필요성도 큰 것으로 제언되고 있다(Lee et al., 2010). 또한 단계별로 국제협력 조직·인력과 예산의 확대를 통한 지원체계 구축과 아울러 사업의안정성과 지속성 확보를 위한 법제화가 매우 중요하다 할 것이다.

Virtual project organization may be recognized as one of the promising business models in which many knowledge sources externalize through cross boundaries of knowledge-based organizations. This paper proposes a knowledge competence evaluation of virtual project organization based on the following perspectives: 1) Individual knowledge perspective, 2) Activity-oriented knowledge perspective, and 3) Knowledge-driven social network perspective. In the framework, individual knowledge competence having experienced or learned from knowledge-based activities and virtual networks in the project, should be evaluated according to the assumption that knowledge and collaboration competence depends on the activities and networks acquired proportionally by the past participation to projects. An illustrative SI example is given in order to validate the proposed evaluation and computing procedure.

본 연구는 농촌지역 발전 및 주민의 삶의 질 향상을 위해 추진된 정부의 다양한 정책 및 사업의 성과를 분석하기 위해 현재 추진 중에 있는 농촌지역개발사업 중 대표성이 있다고 판단되는 농촌마을종합개발사업을 분석대상 사업으로 선정하였다. 분석을 위해 경남 2개 권역과 전남 2개 권역을 사례연구대상권역으로 선정하였다. 사업에 대한 만족도 분석결과, 전체적으로 사업추진에 있어서 각 지역유형별로 명확한 구분을 통해 만족도를 분석하는 것은 상당한 어려움이 있으나, 전반적으로 지역특성별(농촌지역, 중산간지역)로 주민들의 사업에 대한 이해 및 추진과정에서의 만족도 등은 다소 차이가 있음을 확인하였다. 또한, 전반적으로 농촌지역 2개 권역 주민들이 중산간지역 2개 권역 주민들에 비해 상대적으로 사업 추진 전반에 대해 부정적인 의견을 많이 표출하였다. 향후 원활한 사업추진을 위해서는 주민들의 사업에 대한 이해, 서로 돕고 협력하는 마을 공동체 의식의 복원, 바람직한 리더 육성, 실효성 있는 마을 규약 마련, 개방적·포용적 자세로의 전환과 농촌마을종합개발사업 추진 및 운영방법의 현실화가 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Evaluating a project is one of the key activities in managing projects, and thus it should be implemented as a part of the entire project management system. However, currently deployed systems suffer from deficiencies such as the lack of supporting distri

The purpose of this study is to construct a quantitative evaluation method that can analyze the policy effectiveness with the construction of a implicit composite index incorporating spatial econometrics models. In order to propose a methodological framework for the program evaluation, this study conducts an empirical analysis with the application of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project (CRVDP) which explicitly claims to achieve comprehensive goal of community development. The present study pays particular attention to quantifying the composite evaluation index and drawing net effect through the application of a series of spatial econometrics models. The spatial unit of the analysis is drawn at Eup-Myeon level in rural areas in Korea, and the time horizon is in between 2005 and 2010. We utilize the Korean Agricultural Census data in 2005 and 2010. Three steps of methodological processes are needed to satisfy the objective of the present study. First, we apply factor analysis to construct the composite index that represents comprehensive settlement environment in rural area. The index should be matched with the main objective of the CRVDP. Second, we apply the derived index to a series of spatial econometrics model as dependent variable. Lastly, utilizing the estimated coefficients of the econometrics models, we apply decomposition technique to estimate CRVDP’s net effect from both cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. We find that the results of the decomposition analysis by the execution of the CRVDP are positively associated with the explicit object of the project.

In this study, the relative importance for the perception of managers on the comprehensive rural village development projects was evaluated using the AHP method. The fields for evaluation were 4 fields including human relationships, working conditions, work compensation and work burnout. Also, the relative importance for the perception of managers and priority order were analyzed through 15 evaluation items. The analysis result shows that the human relationships among 4 fields were regarded as the most important field, followed by work compensation, working conditions and work burnout. Also, the relationship with the chairperson for the human relationships, continuity of employment for the working conditions, salary for work compensation, and mental stress for work burnout were considered respectively as the most important item. Also, salary among all evaluation items was considered as the most important item for the relative importance, followed by continuity of employment, relationship with village residents and mental stress. However, work load, consulting firms, impersonal treatment and the relations between the administration showed relatively low importance and priority order. It is considered that this analysis result will be used as important preliminary data for establishing the role of manager in the comprehensive rural village development project.

This study has performed comparative analysis on benefit indicators in agricultural irrigation and drainage project cases between Korea and Japan. The irrigation and drainage project with publicity should do economic analysis of direct benefit factors as well as indirect benefit factors. However, traditional economic evaluations are used that benefit factors are lack of consistency and focused on direct benefits. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop indicators for the economic evaluation of irrigation and drainage projects. We conducted a case study between Korea and Japan. The resulting benefit factors was divided into direct factors and indirect factors. The direct benefit factors were increase in income, cost savings. The indirect benefit factors were protection of property due to flooding, agricultural promotion, aesthetic improvement. The implications of this study are that the indicators of economic analysis can be evaluated and easily applied. Moreover, these indicators could promote the feasibility of economic analysis.

In this study, thermal environment improvements throughout public design improvement project on the urban street space were compared and evaluated. Thermo-Render 3.0, 3D-CAD based thermal environment simulation program, had been used for thermal environment improvement evaluations. Followings are the results. First, clayey blocks which have low heat transfer rate and cool island effect by trees and roof gardens brought cooling effects for buildings and surface of streets. Seconds, MRT values showed low levels because of low radiant mulching materials. Thirds, roof gardens contributed to reduce heat island effect since HIP levels were affected by decreasing heat storage effect of buildings from roof gardens. As a result, reducing heat storage effect throughout selecting and arranging proper materials which would not increase heat island potentials should be performed to improve heat island effects.

In this study, We developed an evaluation system for the interim check of Integrated Rural Village Development Project and analyzed its applicability to an actual evaluation process through a pilot evaluation on regions selected. The evaluation system consists of documentary assessments(30%) and field inspections(70%). The documentary assessments are quantitative assessments on check-lists reports by self-evaluation prepared by local governments. The field inspections are qualitative assessments by evaluation teams. Sixteen evaluation indices were developed for documentary assessments and seven criteria were designed for field inspections. For a pilot evaluation, one region in each province excluding Jeju Do, eight regions was selected and the field inspections due to circumstances was proceeded in two regions. The results of documentary assessments indicate that most of regions are evaluated low in project performance attributable to the delay in security for sites. In the field inspections, it appears that most of the regions evaluated high at the documentary assessments got a high point from them. They also show that coordination of action plans, rather than quantitative achievements, is a base determining success of the projects.