The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique among task related techniques(motion & time study, job redesign, physical environment improvement) for improving work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprise. This study consists of

The purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to select more productive projects among various proposed projects in a particular company. To achieve this research objective, the characteristics of project evaluation and selection are first reviewed with respect to when, where, and how the decision is made. Then the theoretical basis of the AHP is briefly reviewed along with its mathematical underpinnings to construct the framework of project evaluation and selection. To be more specific, the evaluation and selection criteria were reorganized in the AHP-based framework to make the process of project evaluation and selection more productive. Project evaluation and selection is one of the most important activities for the most companies to be more advantageous in the market. Despite the importance of decision making process of project selection, not many of how to choose the best project were suggested as the reliable project selection methods in the industries. It may be because it involves various activities related to conflict resolution among different evaluation criteria, high uncertainties of market, and the unclear tradeoff among various project objectives. Furthermore, the decision, once made at this point, tends to be irrevocable until the whole process turns out to be a complete success or failure. As the result, the AHP method showed better financial performance rather than the traditional method in a case study.

Multi-criteria decision making is deducing the relativistic importance in the criterion of decision making and each alternative which is able to make a variety of choices measures the preferred degree in the series of low-ranking criterions. Moreover, this is possible by synthesizing them systematically. In general, a fun-diametral problem decision maker should solve for multi-criteria decision making is evaluating a set of activities which are considered as the target logically, and this kind of work is evaluated and synthesized by various criterions of the value which a chain of activities usually hold in common. In this paper, we study about effective consumer preference to towels made of paper according to the three kinds of intensities of products from some domestic company, using the AHP.

There are many reason for unsafety action without safety operation. The reason is no standard safety operation in company or the workers never get a enough education. Standard safety operation is prepared by paper for accurate directions and orders and operators must read the paper to prevent an error of action. Also an essential particular is safety of equipment and machine must be assumed to establish standard safety operation then safety of operations will be possible.

  In general, reliability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) depends on pairwise comparison of evaluators. In addition, human judgment on the importance of alternatives or criteria is always imprecise and vague. To cope with these shortcomings, Fuzzy AHP

본 연구에서는 해운기업의 안전관리체제 운영 지원과 시스템 운영 모니터링 및 운영성과 평가도구로 활용할 수 있는 안전관리체제 운영평가 지표를 개발하였다. 이 지표를 이용하여 안전관리체제 도입을 준비하고 있는 기업이나, 기도입하여 유지 발전시키고자 하는 기업에게 운영 단계별 필요한 지식을 알기 쉽게 종합 수록하여 상시 활용할 수 있는 지침서 내지 컨설턴트 역할을 할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 자체 내부심사 시 및 시스템 운영성과 평가 시 평가도구로 활용하여 시스템의 지속적인 개선 및 발전에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 보인다. 이 지표는 크게 대 기준 11개 항목, 중 기준 33개 항목, 소 기준 447개 항목으로 구성되어 있다.

  The importance of intellectual property is increasing in the knowledge and information era. An organization that embraces technology and strategy is faced with promising opportunities and managerial difficulties.   Forecasting the performance of technol

  The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique from AMT (Advanced Manufacturing Technologies) and IMP (Innovative Management Practices) for improving manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The research consists

도로건설사업에서 정책적인 의사결정이 필요한 경우, 다기준 평가방법인 AHP로 전문가 설문조사를 통한 정책적 분석을 시도하였다. 그러나 PI 제도 도입에 따라 도로관련 전문가뿐 아니라 지역주민, 환경단체 등 여러 관련 그룹의 다양한 의견이 제기되므로, 그룹간 의견을 종합하는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 도로건설사업의 PI 제도 운영실태를 연구 사례로 하여, AHP모형의 가중치 계산과정에서 각 그룹별로 설문조사한 자료를 이용하여, 의사결정과정에서 그룹별로 어떤 요인들을 중요시하는지 그룹별 AHP 분석을 시행하고, 그룹별 가중치가 반영된 통합 결과와 비교평가하였다. 분석결과, 그룹간 평가항목에서 분산분석(ANOVA)에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되어, 각 그룹마다 중요하게 여기는 평가항목의 우선순위가 상이함이 확인되었다. 종합평가 결과 평가대안은 동일한 결과를 보였으나, 첫째, 그룹간 AHP 분석결과 전문가 그룹과 주민 그룹간, 전문가 그룹과 시민단체 그룹간에 유의한 차이가 있어, 그룹별 평가 필요성이 제기되었다. 둘째, 통합평가를 위한 그룹간 평가가중치 산정결과에도 현저한 차이가 나타났으며, 가중치를 고려한 AHP분석방법이 다양한 그룹의 의사결정 지원도구로 활용될 수 있다고 판단된다.

The ANP(Analytic Network Process), though based on the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), is a system for the analysis, synthesis, and justification of complex decisions with the capability to model non-linear relations between the elements. ANP allows the decision makers to leap beyond the traditional hierarchy to the interdependent environment of network modeling. The ANP is designed for problems characterized by the added complexity of interdependencies such as feedback and dependencies among problem elements. Using a network approach makes it possible to represent and analyze interactions, incorporate non-linear relations between the elements, and synthesize mutual effects by a single logical procedure. This study intends to evaluate the contribution of technology in intangible assets by the AHP and ANP.

  This study proposes a new approach which combines Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) techniques to effectively evaluate Decision Making Units (DMUs). While DEA evaluates a quantitative data set, employs linear progr

The online game industry stands on the center of a industrial values and cultural values of the digital contents industry. It grows rapidly among the cultural industries, leads in the future digital contents industry of Korea and stands in the hub of future industry making a high value added in the world. This study proposed the game evaluation criteria and analyzed the ranking of the important factors among the evaluation criteria. In this study it is used the analytic hierarchy process model to decide ranking of the important evaluation factors. Main criteria decided 4 factors: company, game components, game characteristics and customer service. Sub-criteria included 25 factors, game investment, name value, scenario, etc. As a result of the analysis, the game characteristics takes the top rank in the main criteria. Also interesting takes the top rank in the sub-criteria.

세계적으로 각 분야에서 SERVQUAL 모형과 SERVPERF 모형 등을 이용한 서비스품질에 대한 측정과 관련된 연구들이 많이 수행되어 오고 있지만 서비스품질을 계량화시키기 위한 연구는 활성화되고 있지 못한 상황이다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 불확실하고 주관적인 환경에서 서비스품질을 객관성있게 측정하고 계량화시키기 위해서 Triangular Fuzzy Number(TFN)와 Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)를 이용하여 서비스품질을 측정하기 위한 방법을 제안하기 위한 것이다.

  The potential needs as well as visible needs of customer should be considered in order to research and analyze of the customer data. The methods to analyze customer data is classified into customer segmentation, clustering analysis model, forecasting cu

본 연구는 해양사고 피해규모에 의해 우리나라 수색·구조 구역의 위험수준을 평가하였다. 위험수준 평가를 위해서 전문가 지식에 기반한 퍼지로직, 퍼지측도 및 t-준노름 퍼지적분법을 이용하였다. 본 연구의 퍼지로직은 퍼지 확장원리에 의한 최대최소화 합성이고, 비퍼지화는 무게중심법을 이용하였고, 최종 평가는 t-준노름 퍼지적분법을 이용하였다. 그 결과 목포, 통영, 여수 수색·구조 구역의 위험수준이 가장 높은 것으로 평가되어, 향후 위험수준을 경감하기 위해 많은 구조선과 구조장비가 필요 할 것으로 판단된다.