그동안 통일신라시기의 산성은 성벽이나 문지, 집수시설 등을 중심으로 발굴조사 되었 다. 그 결과 성벽의 축조기법이나 조성 시기, 구조 등에 대해선 비교적 많은 자료가 축적된 것이 사실이다. 그러나 한편으로 산성의 주체인 인간의 숙식 등과 관련된 건물지의 조사는 상대적으로 빈약한 편이다. 통일신라시기의 산성 내 건물지는 대체로 기단석을 갖추고 있으나 동 시기 사찰에서 볼 수 있는 가구식기단은 아직까지 확인된 바 없다. 그리고 이 시기의 주요 난방 시설인 쪽구들 의 경우도 초석 건물지에서 발견된 사례가 거의 없다. 단적으로 전면 발굴조사가 진행된 광 양 마로산성의 경우 성주나 하급 관리, 병사들이 머물 수 있는 난방시설이 턱 없이 부족함을 살필 수 있다. 아울러 전술한 기단석의 위계도 거의 찾아볼 수 없다. 당시 광양 마로산성은 치소성이나 거점성으로 인식될 정도로 중요한 산성이었다. 그러나 성주나 관리, 병사들이 상주하기 위한 온돌 건물지와 성주가 머물렀을 것으로 추정되는 건 물지의 기단석 등은 쉽게 구별할 수 없다. 이는 결과적으로 산성 내 건물지가 일상생활을 영 위하기 어려운 구조였음을 알게 한다. 그런 점에서 향후 산성 외부의 건물지 조사에 좀 더 집중할 필요가 있다고 생각된다.

‘북사’명 토기 출토 건물지는 사비도성의 南北道路에서 동쪽으로 약 30m 정도 떨어진 지점에 자리하고 있다. 이 건물지의 북쪽 1.5m 거리에는 인공으로 조성된 샘이 하나 있고, 여기에서 북쪽 2m 거리에는 동서방향으로 석축이 지나고 있다. 이 석축은 사비도성의 북쪽 경계를 표시하는 석축이다. ‘북사’명 토기 출토 건물지는 절반 정도만 조사 되었다. 규모는 남북 너비가 7.7m이고, 동서 길이는 4m만이 확인되었다. 동서 길이가 제대로 확인되지 않았지만 전체적으로 볼 때 남향의 건물이었음을 알 수 있다. 이 건물지는 소형의 독립가옥 형태를 하고 있는데, 지붕에 와당을 사용하고 있으며, 주변에서 祭器로 사용된 듯한 특수한 토기들이 다량 출토되었다. 그런 점에서 祭祀를 거행한 신성한 장소였던 것으로 추정된다. 사료에 의하면 백제는 사비도성내에 始祖 仇台廟를 모시고 1년에 4차례 제사를 지냈다고 한다. 그런 점에서 ‘北舍’명 토기 출토 건물지가 바로 그 始祖 仇台廟가 아닐까 생각된다.

It was identified by the excavation that architecture remains were confirmed buddhist temple consist of ruins of main building of a temple, auditorium site, ruins of stone pagoda, embankment, pedestrian Facilities and drainage etc. in the Gwangmyeong-dong site. The site has been held temple arrangement with 1 main building of a temple, twin Pagodas from the Unified Silla period to Goryeo dynasty. The temple constructed after that was destroyed the architecture in the Unified Silla period. It seems that aristocrat or royalty power of within group of the nearby remains of city which was constructed in the Unified Silla period build and visit the temple. Considering there are excavations, it assumes that the temple had been constructed during the last days of the Unified Silla, was closed up during the mid-Goryeo Dynasty.

Balhae(698~926) was the ancient state which opened the Nambuk-guk period with the Unified Silla. But Balhae architecture began to included in the history of Korean architecture only about 15 years ago, such as the books written by Yun Jang-seop or Ju Nam-cheol. I discussed four issues related to Balhae architecture in this paper. First, I criticized the excavation report of 24 stones remains at Jiangdong in Duhua city, and I asserted the ondol site belonged to different period. Second, I also interpreted that the building found on the tombs no.13 and no.14, in the Longhai burial area in Helong city must be a wooden stupa. Third, Balhae played some important roles in the history of ondol. It developed Koguryeo ondol in terms of structure, gave an opportunity to the ruling class to adopt ondol for the first time, and passed the heating system down to the Jurchen, the ancestor of the modern Manchurian. Fourth, the Russian-Korean joint research team excavated seven building sites in Koksharovka 1 fortress from Russian territory these four years, and it is reasonable to assume the fortress was the center of Anbyeon-bu, one of 15 local government districts in Balhae. I guess this buildings were the royal shrine built by resisters after the fall of Balhae, and the vessel stands found there must be used for ancestral memorial ceremony inside them.

본고는 하동 두우산에 소재하는 봉수에 대한 소개글이다. 하동군 금성면 두우산 정상부에서 확인된 봉수 3기는 남-북 능선을 따라 위치하며, 추정 건물지 1기도 함께 확인되었다. 특이한 것은 봉수의 구조ㆍ형태가 각각 다르다. 이들 중 연대(煙臺)형 봉수를 추정 계화산봉수(1호 봉수), 방호벽 내부가 빈 평면 원형의 봉수를 두우산봉수1(2호 봉수), 두우산봉수2(봉수 3호)라 명명하였다. 1호 봉수는 방호벽이 확인되지 않고 연대만 확인된다. 연대의 평면형태는 타원형이다. 1호 봉수 주변에서는 채석지와 음각으로 새겨진 劍모양이 확인된다. 이 검모양은 당시 봉수군이 휴대하고 다녔던 고리칼(還刀)를 표현한 것으로 보인다. 두우산 정상부 쪽에서 1호 봉수와 관련된 건물지가 확인되었다. 추정 건물지 담장석축 주변으로 우물로 추정되는 석축 2기와 말굽형 석축, 채전지로 추정되는 석축 3기가 확인된다. 2호 봉수의 평면형태는 중앙이 비어있는 도넛형태로 축조된 것이 특징적이다. 봉수대는 방호벽, 방호벽 내 배수시설로 추정되는 호와 출입시설, 석곽형태로 조성된 추정 창고시설 등이 확인된다. 봉수 3호는 1호 봉수와 2호에 비해 훼손이 심해 정확한 구조를 알 수 없지만, 연대의 북동쪽과 남서쪽에서 가공한 석재의 면을 맞추어 놓은 석렬이 확인되어 관련 시설로 추정된다. 본고에서는 그동안 봉수의 조사사례가 미흡했던 하동지역 봉수의 형태, 규모, 구조등을 파악하는데 치중하였다. 향후 대상 지역 봉수의 정밀한 조사와 기능적 접근을 통해 봉수의 통시적 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Jeongrimsaji as temple remains of Baekje Sabi period, its re-excavation has been carried three times in full scale. As a result, the buildings in left and right of lecture hall was largely identified in 3 forms. First, layout of small buildings in left and right of lecture hall. Second, layput of corridor in left and right of lecture hall. Third, layout of construction site in the north of corridor in left and right of lecture hall. Above second is included into remains of Gorye, the third is included into remains of Baekje - the remains were almost ruined then. The first form and third form in above is different each other in size of buildings, form of layout, and location. It is important to investigate these points: the time of constructing the buildings; what position have the use and function of the buildings in the temple? ; transition process of layout of the Buddhist temple. In this context, of temple remains in Baekje during the 5~7th century, the cases where construction sites in left and right of lecture hall and construction site in the north of corridor are identified, have been reviewed. Based on this review, the use and function of buildings, their transition process were investigated. The survey results show that small buildings in left and right of lecture hall existed in the middle and later period of the 6th century. During the later 6th century ~ the 7th century, construction site in narrow and long square shape was located in left and right of lecture hall instead of small buildings in the north of corridor. Therefore, it is identified that the aforementioned thing is earlier stage and the latter thing is later stage.

In this study, I investigated the function and the setting characteristics of 日type plan building ruins in the Hoe-amsa monastery site, that’s renovated by Zen priest Na-ong(1320-76) in the later Goryeo Dynasty(918-1392), through the comparative research between China, Japan, and Goryeo in that time. The ruins of 日type plan building, located in the east side of Buddha hall ruins, is the ruins of Jungryo(衆寮). It was called as Jeondanrim(旃檀林), and the name can be seen from the record(天寶山檜巖寺修造記) of Yi-saek(李穡, 1328-96). It’s name and the composition of plan is very similar to the Jungryo of Chinese and Japanese Zen monastery in 13th-14thcentury. And from it, we can see that, the priest Na-ong tried to introduce institution of Chinese Zen monastery, which he experienced during the time of study in China. But, the location of Jungryo in Hoe-amsa monastery is deferent from the Zen monastery of China and Japan, and it can be said as the setting characteristics of Hoe-amsa monastery in Goryeo Dynasty.

This study is examine the scales applied to buildings in the age of Unified Silla through construction sites excavated and its results are as follows; First, scales used in the age of Unified Silla were varied like Jucheok, Dangcheok and Hancheok, but it was generally accepted that Dangcheok was used in Yeongjocheok Since it was found that the scales applied to Dabotap at the Bulguksa temple and main building of the Gameunsa temple belonged to Goguryeo, Yeongjocheok scale used early in the age of Unified Silla was transitional and it was thought that Goguryeocheok and Dangcheok were used togethar. Second, according to actual rulers in Korea, china and Japan, the length of Dangcheok(ruler used in Chinese Tang era) mostly belonged to the extent of $29.25cm\;{\sim}\;30.5cm$(central value: 29,71cm). Third, plane features of main building of temple are assumed that it had five rooms in front compartment until the 7th century and then it was diversified to three, five and seven compartment. The size of compartment was same in the scale of front Eokan and Hyeopkan until late 7th century, but since then the dimension of Eokan tended to be wider than Hyeopkan. It was judged that the front Eokan used triple scales like 9, 12, 15, 18 cheok. Fourth, the length of residential structures was 17.5cheok${\sim}$36cheok and Bcheok was commonly used for front side of structure, The length of official structures was 8.4cheok${\sim}$36.3cheok which is similar to residential structures. However it has been confirmed that each of 9cheok, 12cheok, and 15cheok has been used for Eokan and Hyeopkan which gave presumption that triple scales was used for the measure.

In spite of the increasing significance on a scale of building measurement unit and its system having been used in many areas of architecture, only a few researchers carried out the studies on a specific period. It is even harder to find a research results dealt in view of architecture. This research gives a focus on different types of scales employed in the ancient buildings and their sites, based on the research results of unit scale or scales found in recent excavations. After the review of literature on the scales widely used in the ancient times and of the various types of scales excavated archeologically, a kind of scale unit system that had been widely and extensively employed throughout the period of 'Three Kingdoms' could be revealed. The scale system is possibly able to be applied to estimate the exact scale of buildings and their sites as well in that era. The research results show that the scale and its system employed in the East and West buildings and their sites of 'Kum-dang' in 'Mi-ruk Sa' temple are different from 'Kokuryo' scale that was believed in to be used in the temple. Contrary to the suggestion by excavation report on the type of scale employed in the buildings their sites, a scale of 29 centimeters, similar to that of Tang, was employed. It was also found that one module consists of three 'Chuk's of 88.8 centimeters. Based on this scale system, we could conclude that three modules of the buildings on the front and two and half modules of them on the sides were explained by this scale and its system.

The building site was presumed as the Howonjeokwon or the Dasiwonji established at the traffic route among western inland areas in old Pyeonghaegun. The groundwork was composed inclination terrace of two steps. The upper step was the territory of the main house of ceremony․ symbolic+lodging function and the down step was divided in the territory of both Ikrang-chae of boarding and lodging management function and the territory of Haengrang-chae․pavilion of rest․reception․management. The building composition by each territory formed space differentiation with the line of flow according to the thorough rule of court rank. The arrangement composition set the strong center axis in tandem, and it was the building arrangement interpreting the territory and the rule of court rank by function as the relationship of master and servant and was the building type emphasizing on the whole unity with the geometric symmetry structure. The Dasiwonji and the Hyeeumwonji had the common point which is the traffic architecture of semi-governmental management reinforcing the boarding lodging function in the place which a visitor stayed. The Haeeumwonji and Dasiwonji had the difference in the size, but was the same in the composition system of construction. The external space and the system of the line of flow decided from the functional territory separation and the hierarchical rank as thorough as the geometric arrangement focusing on the whole unity. Namely, it was the strict and unusual system of the line of flow depended on the thorough rule of court rank than the efficient approach or arrangement of the line of flow. After being established to be the Howonjeokwon at the end of Koryeo, it disappeared at the time of the invasion of Japanese pirates when it was the time of the King Woo in Koryeo. It is presumed that it was continued until both wars, Imjin․Byeongja, ago after changing its name to the Dasiwon, being restored to the small size at the end of Koryeo-at the early of Choseon.

Studies and reports on buddhist temples in Goryeo dynasty are rarely in the present situation. At this point of time new excavational reports and historic records offer many materials to understand a architecture in Goryeo period. Especially, temple site have various transitions, it is of great value to study. This article attempted a restorative study of a location, function, spacial arrangement, structure, building age is based on a measure and transition of temple layout that is based on the excavational result and related historic documents about Godal temple site in Yeoju. Godal temple site was a representative Zen buddhist temple in Goryeo Dynasty. It was difficult of access by watercourse because it was located in an inland in the upper Han River. Archaeological research and historical records has reveals that the temple was constructed with a minium of four levels[six terms]. We could recognized the central site of temple and buildings were constantly established, enovated or collapsed. It has went through many transition according as it encountered new sects and doctrines. Also it should perform various functions and overcome given conditions. Ultimately it let see greater diversity in the spacial composition, and layout. That is to say it were planed several separate areas, each was consisted of main buildings, once again was integrated into one temple.