In this paper I examine Cesare Cattaneo and Mario Radice’s Camerlata Fountain in northern Italy, focusing on the work's relation to the urban environment and its "mobility" over several decades. As I demonstrate, the design of Cattaneo and Radice’s work relates to the circular layout of a traffic intersection and was intended to be viewed from the window of a moving automobile. In this way it continues a tradition, begun by the Futurists and continued by Le Corbusier, which saw the car as central to modern art and architecture. Moreover, the work relates to the concept of mobility in so far as it was in itially built in 1936 in Milan and subsequently destroyed and reconstructed during 1962 in its current location near Como. As the history of the work’s conception, production and reception demonstrates, Cattaneo and Radice’s work not only responds to the experience of vehicle-generated mobility in modern society but also reveals the tensions and anxieties associated with an increasingly dynamic urban environment.

Street art operates within an already given visual order: the visuality of the modern city in which the regimentation of the image has become fully adaptive to –what Fredric Jameson termed– the logic of late capitalism. What is the relationship between street art and the hegemonic forms of the image dictated by the “city’s rulers”? Does street art evoke an alternative kind of spectatorship? Can the unsolicited visual intervention in the life of the city open up an “optics” that resists the reifying patterns of the contemporary gaze? This paper follows Baudrillard’s pioneering analysis of graffiti, arguing that the visuality of a certain kind of street images carries an important potential of challenging the hegemonic manner in which the contemporary image has come to dominate the field of vision.

What is Art on the street? Is it a series of artworks or activities performed on the street? In other words, does “art on the street” refer to “Street Art” such as street performance, happening, graffiti, or wall-painting, or does it refer to “Street Furniture” which is related to “City Design” or “Environmental Design”? In a formal sense, they all belong to Art on the street. However, in this paper, I would like to use Art on the street in an even broader sense. To me, “the street” is a metaphor of “environment.” Thus Art on the street is the art related to environment; it is an environment art. Art on the street attests the expansion of the concept of art and shows a new possibility of contemporary art. It is a promising new concept of art, but we cannot ignore the misapplication of the concept that we can find at the crossroad of Art on the street and “city beautification.” Of course, Art on the street can and sometimes needs to beautify the city. However we still need to ask how to contribute to the city beautification with Art on the street and how to validate such a practice. City space is, most of all, a space that people live in. It sounds a cliché, but it is worth repeating to better understand Art on the street. When we consider the city space in terms of its system or organization, we often overlook that it is the space in which people live, and which people create. Art on the street concerns not the city itself, but the space in which people live and make relations for each other. Without taking this into account, Art on the street becomes a mere means to ‘embellish’ the city and falls prey to the logic of capital. In this paper, I critically reviewed the problems such as City Development, Spectacularization, City Environmental Design, Public Interest and City Museum. I intended to emphasize that Art on the street is produced in the cultural space of city, but it also tends to break the mold of the cultural space and seeks a new possibility. Some might argue that my claims are unrealistic because Art on the street is not an idea but a practice. While humbly accepting the objection, I hope my critical suggestions guide a more productive direction to continue our discussions of Art on the street.

This essay examines how the figure of Liberty has been refashioned in the streets of post‐apartheid South Africa, addressing three public art works installed in Johannesburg over the past decade: Reshada Crouse’s oil painting Passive Resistance, Marlene Dumas’ tapestry The Benefit of the Doubt and William Kentridge’s and Gerhard Marx’s sculpture Firewalker. Even as these monumental works all reprise Delacroix’s Liberty on the Barricades – an icon of the city street and its revolutionary barricades – so too this trio of Liberties have become mere phantoms of their vaunted archetype. Haunted specters, they quarrel with the mythologized chimera of Liberty, taking issue with the fraught tradition of pinning regime change onto the body of the female nude. Drawing instead on South African histories of women’s resistance, in which female nudity has been repeatedly marshaled as a form of dissent, the Liberties circling Johannesburg hybridize their European template with local traditions of female political opposition to colonial and postcolonial male authority.

Mona Hatoum and community make unlikely bedfellows. From her beginnings as a teenage exile to her maturity as an internationally celebrated artistic nomad, Hatoum defies classification within any single geographical or cultural community. Attempting, however, to locate specific points of contact between her and certain communities in terms of artist‐in‐residence projects in which she participated might be a particularly fruitful way of circumventing her notorious critical resistance to identity and her refusal of homogeneity. This paper starts with Miwon Kwon’s critique of contemporary practices in community‐based art, which locate an essentialising force that isolates a single point of commonality and overlooks authentic differences. It then turns to Jean‐Luc Nancy’s reconceptualization of community as ‘unworked’ and ‘being‐in‐common’ to provide analytical tools for avoiding the dangers of essentialism. By examining the three residencies that Hatoum accepted in the mid‐1990s in the light of Nancy’s observations and theories, and by bringing the idea of artistic nomadism and that of community into juxtaposition, we hope to show that Hatoum succeeds in finding an equilibrium between art and community, and that this sheds new light on the issues raised in recent discussions on such relationship

This study discusses the community of participants in new media-based art of Taeyoon Choi, Wafaa Bilal and Mushon Zer-Aviv in relation to current discourses on social functions of art by Nicolas Bourriaud and Jacques Rancière. Focusing on these artists' participatory projects which aim to provide alternative perspectives on wars between countries, to raise awareness about expanding surveillance systems in city spaces, or to create new public spaces on the web, this paper argues that their works hybridize entertainment culture and political activism to suggest a new model for political art.

Der Beitrag befasst sich mit der partizipatorischen Inszenierung von Medienkunst im öffentlichen Raum. Das Medienkunstprojekt ‚Energie‐Passagen’ von Monika Fleischmann und Wolfgang Strauss ist ein Ausdruck des Übergangs zwischen realer und virtueller Umgebung. In der Verbindung von physikalischem Raum und digitalen Artefakten eröffnet die Installation einen real/virtuell überlagerten Wahrnehmungsraum und misst die Energie der Stadt auf metaphorische Weise. Die gemeinsame Erfahrung des Lesens und Schreibens täglicher Nachrichten und ihrer Transformation in ein Sprachspiel assoziativer Splitter und Plateaus zu einer rhizomatischen Verweisstruktur bestimmt die interaktive Handlung. Das Publikum wird zu kommunikativer Performanz eingeladen und die Interaktivität des Geschehens wird als Statistik der Ereignisse im Internet dokumentiert und als Energie‐Bild der Stadt visualisiert. Inszeniert als ein Fluss von Worten, wird die Installation zu einem begehbaren Informationsbrowser, der zum Flanieren in den Nachrichten einlädt. Die Idee einer Mixed‐Reality‐Bühne bestimmt den interaktiven Denkraum zum Lesen und Be‐Schreiben der Stadt.

The article examines the attempts made at economic revitalisation of Ljubljana’s inner city and the consequences or “collateral damage” of this process. A lot of attention is given to the wider socio-cultural context, in which art istic practices are embedded in the city, and to the Slovenian population’s perception of such practices. Artistic groups and their practices are in this sense used as part of an ‘interim development’ strategy, i.e. temporary guests(non-statutory tenants) are warmly welcomed because their (sub)cultural capital happens to cultivate the area, making it "cool" and attractive, but when the value of the area’s real estate begins to rise their low-income status does not grant them any tenant protection. Regardless of the social role they played in revitalising the city, these groups are therefore gradually ousted from neighbourhoods, which quite ironically are often advertised in the real estate market as the city’s "Bohemian" or "cultural" quarters. This makes us aware of the lack of unique alternative or informal spaces, venues for alternative art movements and practices in the cities. These issues are presented on the cases of the alternative spaces of Metelkova and the Rog Factory, both located in Ljubljana’sinnercity.

The term “philosophizing art” was coined by Arthur Danto, who tried to define new forms of art, especially Andy Warhol’s pop art appeared in New York after 1960’s, which could not be explained by traditional concept of “representation”. As Danto said “the term 'philosophizing art' is unclear, whether art discusses philosophical issues or art is the object of philosophic discussions,” it does not seem like Danto himself had a specific idea when he used this term. The background for Danto coining this term derives from the fact that the old art concept such as denotation and connotation could not fully explain phenomenalistic aspects of concept art which appeared frequently at that time. Many articles in his book “philosophizing art," in which many of his criticism are included, mainly say that art begins philosophizing by dealing with not mimesis or representation but concepts. According to his argument, the history of western art, which has been consisted of mimesis and representation, has come to end when art is about physically embodied with meaning. Of course, as Danto say so, what goes to end is not art itself, but the narrative of art. It means master narrative saying art should be shown different from nature or artificial daily product is over. Danto could not find principals of mimesis and representation which had been main logic in the western art history, when he saw Andy Warhol’s Brillo Boxes at Stable Gallery, New York in 1964. Danto questioned “if we can not distinguish Brillo box’s artistic aspects visually from other factory-made products, how can we distinguish art from non-art,” By answering those questions, he discovered two facts which made him realize the end of Art: One is there is no special way in which works of art have to be shown or has to exist. Therefore, art history has proven that commercial boxes, trashes and files of underwear can be a work of art. The other is we have fully recognized it at the end of 20thcentury. Danto confessed that through Brillo Boxes, he realized the works of art are decided by something can not be seen by eyes, not by distinguished differences by looking at it. This thesis is trying to show personal understanding about art, philosophy and discourses surrounding them and to figure out how Dante opened a new world to art criticism by using new definitions such as ‘end of art’ and ‘philosophizing art’ which Danto used to explain inner aspects of art.