Roughly speaking, binding has to do with the classification of referentially depen dent elements, such as personal pronouns and reflexive pronouns, according to syntactic constraints on the distribution of their possible antecedents. And this theory was established at Comsky(1981) but after that, it was inevitable to avoid revlSlng the resulting problems from the notions in it. The earlier theory was able to explain arguments in the sentences, but not to do them in nps. Still more, by introducing the notion of governing category to resolve them, there is explanatory adequacy in the aspects but it has the problems from the binding phenomena in nps. According to the syntactic constraints, we present an alternative binding theory which is based not on Chomsky’s analysis but on Tiedman’s aspects in GB - syntax This thesis aims to examine the referentaially dependent relations between anaphors and pronouns to the their antecedents towards thus binding theories. To explaine them, section 2 has investigated the problems from On Binding. Section 3 has analyzed the relation of binding to governing category. Section 4 has introduced the concepts of Accessible SUBJECT to resolve the problems from section 4. By comparing and analyzing Chomsky’s complete functional complex and BT - compatibility as alternative methods mentioned above and Tiedman’s governing notions‘ we suggest that Tiedman’s analysis could interpretate anaphors and overt pronouns in the more adequate aspects‘