간행물

LAW & TECHNOLOGY

권호리스트/논문검색
이 간행물 논문 검색

권호

제1권 제1호 창간호 (2005년 7월) 11

1.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
To solve the problem of copyright violation of digital contents, it has been developing and using DRM (Digital Right Management). However, it is not only insufficient situation to satisfy all demand of market yet but also the technology demanded by various market circumstance is changing. This manuscript has shortly introduced the protection technology for digital contents and looked over the direction for development and faced subjects in DRM industry. First, it introduced fingerprinting technology which is capable of tracing illegal duplication by embedding the user's information among the contents as the supplement of DRM technology. Also, we looked over the protection of broadcast contents as an example about the adaption of existing DRM system in the situation which has been changing to digital convergence circumstance. Finally, we shortly looked over standardization of the protection technology and discussed the eventual direction of coping with the situation of industry such as the problem of interoperability between the standards.
4,000원
2.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
In the digital network environment, the copyright holders are increasingly resorting to technological measures to protect their rights in their works or other subject matters, in lieu of legal protection and legal remedies with that copyright law provided. However, even though the technological protection measures are becoming highly sophisticated, all the measures could be eventually defeated by technically sophisticated users or even the ordinary users with the aids of some circumvention devices or the skilled persons. Most of the delegations, gathered in Geneva, Switzerland in December 1996, recognized this problem and lastly agreed to introduce some protection to the technological measures for protecting copyright and neighbouring rights. There are two main issues with the protection of the technological measures. One is whether the access control measures are to be the subject matter of this protection, and another is how we can maintain the exceptions and limitations to the copyright intact, though the application and legal protection of the technological measures. On this issue of the needs of access control power, there seem to be and can be lots of pros and cons. Thus it is at present not proper to say that the introduction of access right or use right is appropriate or not. And, we can say clearly that we have never decided that kind of decision yet. That kind of control power must be given through the same way that the rights, authors already have, were given to them. It is clearly not through the back door, i.e. the provision of the protection of the technological measures. Technologies hear only the voice of their master and are blind to the purpose of using the works. Even though there is no legal protection, ordinary people cannot circumvent the technological measures for legitimate exploitation of a work. Using this situation, the right holders could extend their control over the boundaries of copyright. Without appropriate measures for preserving the room for the exceptions and limitations to the copyright, the liberty of users will be choked with the application and legal protection of the technological measures. If we want to preserve delicate balance on copyright regime, we have to review the impact of the application and legal protection of the technological measures, and take a appropriate measures for preserving the room for the exceptions and limitations to the copyright. If we are negligent to do so, we would fail to get the ultimate goal of sustainable development of culture and economy.
6,000원
3.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
DRM기술은 직∙간접적으로 소비자의 지적 소비활동에 간섭함으로써 지적 프라이버시(intellectual privacy)를 침해한다. DRM기술에 포함된 감시기능은 소비자의 지적 소비활동을 낱낱이 감시∙체크하고 지적 소비활동에 관한 정보의 수집∙이용을 가능케 함으로써 소비자의 정보 프라이버시(Information Privacy)를 침해한다. 또한, 저작물에 대한 접근과 이용을 직접적으로 제한∙통제하는 DRM기술의 접근 차단기능 역시 사적 공간 내에서 누구의 간섭도 받지 않고 개인이 누릴 수 있는 선택의 자유와 자기결정권을 박탈함으로써 공간 프라이버시(Spatial Privacy or Territorial Privacy)를 침해한다. DRM기술은 현대사회의 원칙으로 자리잡은 프라이버시보호원칙, 공정사용원칙(the fair use doctrine), 익명사용원칙, 소비자보호원칙 등에 의해서 제한을 받는다. 프라이버시보호법은 개인정보의 수집∙이용에 대해 일정한 법적 절차에 따를것을 요구하고 있으며 특히 비밀수집은 어떤 경우에도 허용하지 않는다. 따라서 DRM기술의 감시기능은 프라이버시원칙의 직접적인 통제아래 있다. 한편, 공정사용원칙에 의한 저작물의 사용∙복제등은 저작권법이 인정한 소비자의 고유권리로써 DRM기술로도 침해해서는 안 된다. DRM기술에 의한 공정사용권의 제한은 프라이버시침해이자 동시에 권리남용에 해당한다. 라이센스계약 등을 통해서 DRM기술의 채용이나 DRM기술에 의한 개인정보의 수집∙이용에 대해 동의를 받았다고 하더라도 그것은 불공정 계약 또는 강요된 동의에 불과하기 때문에 소비자보호법상 효력이 없다. 따라서 DRM기술이 저작권자의 권리를 보호할 수 있는 합법적인 기술적 보호조치로 보호받기 위해서는 처음부터 소비자의 프라이버시를 고려해서 기획되고 설계될 것이 요구된다. 소비자의 지적 소비생활에 대한 최대한의 감시와 간섭∙제재가 아니라 소비자들의 무분별한 탈선행위를 규제하는 보조적인 역할만 수행하도록 설계되어야 한다. 동시에 그것은 소비자의 공정사용권을 충분히 보장하여야 한다. 그렇게 될 때 DRM기술은 저작권자의 이익뿐만 아니라 소비자의 프라이버시와 지적 탐구이익 더 나아가 과학∙문화의 발전∙향상이라고 하는 저작권법의 목적 달성에도 기여할 것이다.
4,600원
4.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
DRM은 저작권법에 의하여 보호되는 권리에 대하여 정단한 권리나 자격 없이 침해하는 행위를 방지하기 위하여 사용되는 기술적 보호조치이며, 디지털 환경에서 저작권에 대한 새로운 해석을 유도하고, 이를 지속적으로 유효하게 하기 위한 적극적인 수단이다. 본 논문에서는 DRM의 기술적인 요소에 대하여 기술하고, 디지털 컨텐츠의 합법적인 이용을 보호하는 DRM의 확산을 촉진하기 위한 기술 표준화에 대하여 논의한다. DRM의 확산을 이루어내기 위하여서는 무엇보다 DRM의 표준화에 있어서 개방형 기술을 채택하여 제품간의 상호호환성을 높이고 시장에서의 경쟁을 촉진하여야 한다. 또한 디지털 환경의 특수성을 이해하고, 이를 반영할 수 있는 법제도적인 뒷받침이 필요하다. 한편 국내 DRM 산업의 활성화를 위하여 솔루션 개발업체, 저작권자 및 관련단체, 컨텐츠사업자, 서비스 제공자 그리고 정책 담당기관의 광범위한 협조를 통하여 국내 기술표준안을 마련하고, 성공적인 사업모델에 기초하여 국제표준안을 제안하여 세계시장으로 진출할 수 있는 발판을 만들어 가야 할 것이다.
4,600원
5.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
The Internet, revolution referred to as the greatest media medium revolution since the discovery of the printing technology, discovery of typography has given birth to various legal issues in the field of intellectual property rights. Specifically, regulating the usagerelationship between copyright holders and users of their contents has recently been the focus central theme in copyright legislative regime. This article thesis places a focus on the interpretation of the rights of and their usage the relationship between copyright holders and content users in light of the recent technological developments in the copyright legislative regime relating to the music industry, and provides the author's perspective on resulting from the change of technologies in the copyright legislative system, particularly, related to the music industry, the issues that emerged from the music industry and on study of problems in view of business-people over the many years during which the author had worked with leading communications companies, Internet companies, electronic appliance manufacturers, and content providers in Korea. Also, this article thesis also reviews has studied the main issues that emerged from the Soribada case, the largest dispute in the on-line music industry, in which the author was personally involved as legal counsel to the Soribada system operator. Soribada case which was the largest issue in the field of on-line music industry and as a legal working staff on the legal execution process and the content of refutation thereof, so as to catch the core of the refutation. This article thesis is divided into three parts - (1) Part One examines the on-line music industry by looking at its characteristics and possible effects on that is, the contemplation of the on-line music industry about features of the on-line music industry and about what effects the on-line music industry causes to other content markets in the future (2) Part Two discusses various legal issues arising in that the on-line music industry raised, including those related to (i) the right to reproduction, (ii) the right of transmission, (iii) the liabilities responsibility of service providers, (iv) private use, (v) contributory infringement, aiding and abetting and (vi) technological developments of technologies and program production; and (3) Part Three provides the analysis of the Soribada case and the Bugs Music case, which are two representative the P2P case and the streaming cases, and the author's opinion on the legal issues in the on-line music industry which emerged from the aforementioned cases.
5,700원
6.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
Das Medienrecht ist permanent der sturmischen technischen Entwicklung und dem damit verbundenen Strukturwandel des Marktes anzupassen. Die aus dem Zusammenwachsen der Telekommunikations- und Computertechnik entstehenden Multimediadienste eroffnen einerseits eine breite Palette von Moglichkeiten des Informationsaustausches, aber verursacht neue wettbewerbsrechtliche Probleme, die mit dem herkommlichen Regulierungssystem nicht uberwunden werden konnen. Diese Probleme klassifzieren sich in drei Gruppen: Regulierungsmangel, doppelte Regulierungen und ungleiche Regulierung. Das neue Regulierungssystem unter Konvergenzbedingungen, das die o.g. Probleme bewaltigen soll, ist nach der Ergebnis der vorliegenden Arbeit grundsatzlich auf zwei Prinzipien aufzubauen. Erstens sollen die Regulierungsinstrumente bzw. -intensitat nach die jeweiligen Gefahren des zu regulierenden Objektes zu orientieren. Zum zweiten soll das neue Regulierungssystem die durch Regulierungssystem entstandene Rente vermeiden bzw. abschaffen und somit Bedingungen fur den fairen Wettbewerb verschaffen.
4,800원
7.
2005.07 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
Program provider industry has grown in terms of market size volume since start of cable TV in Korea. However, it is facing a serious problem in producing quality original cable programming. The low cable TV subscription fee essentially limits the program compensation to program providers at unreasonably lower level. Since the compensation from cable TV system operator is low, most of program providers heavily depend on home shopping commission fee for survival. This study analyzes the structure of program provider industry. This study indicates that horizontal and vertical integration becomes more popular in big players at both system operator and program provider level.
4,600원

주요 판례 해설

해외 동향