간행물

矯正硏究 KCI 등재 교정연구 Correction Review

권호리스트/논문검색
이 간행물 논문 검색

권호

제16호 (2002년 9월) 6

硏究論文

1.
2002.09 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
The purpose of this study is to test empirically the hypothesis that parents child-rearing, such as attachment, communication, supervision, and punishment would be effected on juvenile delinquency. The data used in this study are drawn from a self-reported survey conducted in Seoul, in 2000. The sample consists of a total of 1,012, middle and high school students aged between 12 and 21. To examine the causal relationship between parents child-rearing and self-reported criminal behavior, we used Joreskog and Sorbom's LISREL Ⅷ. The hypothesis was supported. From our study, it is implied that future research should attempt to develop a more refined model on the relationship between child-rearing and crime, and to elaborate the measures on the major concepts such as parental child rearing, and criminal behavior.
5,700원
2.
2002.09 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
When examining existing theories of crime, we are led to an agreement that crime is eventually private as well as public evil. However this conclusion may neglect a possibility that whoever lives his life as a good citizen under the constraint of law in a nation-state may someday find himself to be a criminal. Crime is not just a problem caused by a special kind of man. Even if we can tell criminal activities as delinquent, it is not unreasonable that they are not abnormal. Based on the assumption that a few special persons commit crimes, so far most literatures on crime tend to concentrate on either some properties of criminals or the relation between environmental and human factors. Circumscribed by its narrow presupposition, criminology cannot but provide the crippled power of explanation over the ocean of criminal cases in reality. If we admit crime is a normal phenomenon of everyday social routine, it may be more profitable for the future studies of correction to focus on the question of how to defend our society from criminal delinquencies in practice than to make efforts in making conflictive arguments in theory. Also how to rehabilitate criminal victims who have been excluded from the process of criminal justice should be stressed as a main theme in light of criminal policies. In consideration of these problematics, this study tries to show the future direction of correction policies. Chapter 2 explains the existing theories and groups them into two families according to their analytic dimensions. Classifying the theories of innate or inherent criminality as of 'personal level causes,' I call the theories of socio-environmental factors as of 'social level causes.' In chapter 3, I examine both the existing theories on crime and some problems in the current corrective system with a critical viewpoint. In chapter 4, I want to present a few alternatives for the future direction of correction. These alternatives include the cooperation and coordination between criminal justice agencies, reparation for criminal victims, and the introduction of private jails or penitentiaries. In this article, I argue we should concentrate our attention rather on correcting offenders individually by changing their relations with structural factors than on searching for the more evident causes of crime. In terms of improvement I also propose some measures such as the introduction of governmental indemnification for the whole society as well as individuals directly victimized by crimes and the prisoners' reimbursement system for their own penitentiary costs. We are so deeply accustomed to the rational and mechanical type of assumption that we cannot be readily accept the critical review developed in this study. However we explore the causes of crime to improve our society in practice. If we accept this ultimate purpose of criminological studies, it cannot be denied the importance of practical efforts to enhance the efficiency of corrective policies as well as to realize common good for all the people pertinent to the social phenomena of crime including offenders as the objects of correction, victims, law enforcing agencies and even tax payers who want social security.
6,600원
3.
2002.09 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
In recent years, police and correctional agencies in USA have formed a variety of partnerships in which their staff collaborate to share information or jointly perform services in ways that benefit both agencies. The police-corrections partnerships developed in the context of reforms that were intended to alter in fundamental ways the manner in which policing and corrections are performed. In law enforce, the most common such reform is community policing. In corrections, emerging reform models are termed community justice or community probation. It seems more and more apparent that the police alone cannot solve many crime and order problems, but that in partnership with others who have resources of their own to offer -- time, money, expertise, ideas, energy, equipment, and more -- perhaps they can. It has become for innovative police departments to invest a good deal of effort in enlisting the aid of others, and to tackle problems by allying police resources and strengths with those of others. One resource seldom tapped by police agencies remains the local correction department. Perhaps as a result of interdepartmental rivalry or a perceived conflicts of missions, many police departments have little, if any, contact or communication with the correction department serving the same jurisdiction. This paper seggests Police-Corrections Meeting Programs, Notification System Appointing liaison officers, Ride-Along Program, Cooperative safety effort involving police officers and probation officers, Variation of community service order, Corrections personnel's participation of Citizen Police Academies, Communication of police-correction volunteer, Cooperative law enforcement.
7,700원
4.
2002.09 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
In den letzten Jahren mehren sich in Korea die Bericht, in denen Jugendkriminalitat und Jugendstrafgefangene als erhebliche soziale Probleme empfunden wird. Die Straf von Jugendlichen wird in Jugendstrafnstalten vollyogen. In Korea existieren aber nur fur die mannlichen Jugendlichen zwei Anstalten, fur weiblichen keine. Daraus erscheint die Vermehrung, Besserung bzw. Modernisierung von Jugendstrafanstalt erforderlich. Vor allem ist die Besserung und Qualifizierung der Unterricht, Modernisierung der Arbeit, Ausdehnung der Leibesubung und Beurlaubung usw. erforderlich. Jugendgesetz sieht Unterricht in der Jugendstrafanstalt vor. In den meisten Jugendstrafanstalten kann der Schulabschluß nachgeholt werden. Aber ist dieser Schulabschluß fur Jugendliche sehr schwer. Daher braucht es die Besserung und Modernisierung des Unterrichtssystems. Die Arebit, vor allem die berufliche Forderung der Verurteilten halt der Gesetzgeber fur wesentlich. Tatsachlich sind die wenigen jugendlichen Gefangenen vor ihrer Einlieferung kontinuierlicher Arbeit nachgegangen, eine Berufsausbildung hat kaum einer abgeschlossen. Daher soll die Jugendstrafanstalten Lehrwerkstatten einrichten und die vielfaltigen und unterschiedlichen Ausbildung ausfuhen. Außerdem ist die Beurlaubung wichtig fur die Resozialisierung der jungendliehen Geganenen und Beziehung mit der Familie. Deshalb ist die Voraussetzung der Beurlaubung zu erleichtern.
6,900원
5.
2002.09 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
This study emphasizes a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime risk factors in individual, family, school, peer group, and community levels. This effort includes prevention, early intervetion, and treatment services for juvenile offenders. This study offers a coordinated, community-based multi-agency network system both to provide several simultaneous services for youths and to reduce disorganized neighborhood environments. This stuy suggests a role of each agency such as family, school, welfare center, police, probation officials, church, business, and residents in a community-based comprehensive multi-agency collaboration. This study emphasizes the engagement of neighborhood residents as a main role in comprehensive multi-agency activities.
8,400원
6.
2002.09 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
Since sustenance and abolition of death penalty system have an argument about the world view, we cannot conclude which one is right. The death penalty system can be changed by the age and situation. In Korea, the death penalty system is based on the situation of its application and Korean people's mind of law. So we should investigate the death penalty system in terms of fluctuating the two factors. In the first stage, the death penalty system has to be reformed with respect to reduction of the death penalty regulation, establishment of the criteria in death penalty application, and elaboration of criminal suit procedures. In the second stage, the system of death penalty suspension should be introduced as a transitional one to abolish death penalty. This is the necessary system from the viewpoint of humanism and criminal policy. It is also essential to avoid misjudgement. This system has a five-year deferral period, in which after five-year suspension, we will determine whether death penalty is executed or penal servitude for life is served. In the final stage, when it is legally convinced that people in Korea reach a consensus to abolish death penalty, we should introduce special penal servitude for life, which is more strict than the present penal servitude for life. Moreover, we should reform regulations of criminal law to be able to assign penal servtude for life as well as special one to criminals.
6,100원